From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-oi0-x22e.google.com (mail-oi0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3964D3B29E for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2017 17:02:55 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-oi0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id m124so125919204oif.1 for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2017 14:02:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=1LcjY5eaWz18SKP3YRXDdnv6gbmwwWrURADC7pD5lnM=; b=CPjwKb7fCWX49ScN/TL67aZBKOACtfNsILWdQNkoLdsLs2BTZ6wtkC0EkNs76b9gfL b7YnW1sL/CKQ1zqWcE7141KXehaMwqHgknO6bQfD6/KeGt80AMYUSxbR4lNOGTLmw4+P UoJOvk+dsco7uUlWt8RNZrI+k/VjMcbYK6nBr6lpBCZ05/+xvjTIE6vH6wmzzRNNyFXT PK6iXGmFKCA/PNaOuV4PIddPviSM7vxlAvmUgzBMz7eoUUEg0tjGDajID0h+SgBgdaZs FQzDh4UMe7x0+P4Xjicabn0Ewwil14dkMYJ0ugppVUx43RCVQFi7n1pwGVc1PXFTHtcm 2tew== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=1LcjY5eaWz18SKP3YRXDdnv6gbmwwWrURADC7pD5lnM=; b=GldmVN69GvTOrSAj5IkPKFhCPPujaN+qflhnu3nTMeC4XE3b2zXQ+fTvl+3o6O/5eC 61qobWslxDEn6uMqGh5VDe8YToWGgVbt1uFHhI2frnXFhy8/4jL6YaTnXELDUlHryRsm bV2Ccc/JPGZGJ4gd0Etjfp5hS0HyJMsl8tmEW8xAKVeFaw4k5MsrUNNiHU4AVA70QOk7 cNAsZLnSkmDy7rPPWeohqLk9uRooZaisw4T4bUQy9XiGSBRcl1FVXRMJacSml1EqaeVE SaRezKy9qoqVj84Anwnc1XgSsytweV1STd4hrD8li+b2DJU1tfBfFQDaQotwCuTspzpn 405Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXJXmCt/rQE1gQuAXeSQBp5LhtMN1MSS2OdpujhBnI4j1qyUq6uChxK56yLfdCJkjhLAG3cKJVOSTO7POtLm X-Received: by 10.202.108.5 with SMTP id h5mr22146023oic.29.1485381774610; Wed, 25 Jan 2017 14:02:54 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.202.244.203 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Jan 2017 14:02:24 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Neal Cardwell Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 17:02:24 -0500 Message-ID: To: Hans-Kristian Bakke Cc: bloat Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1142dfae087c450546f26563 Subject: Re: [Bloat] Initial tests with BBR in kernel 4.9 X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 22:02:55 -0000 --001a1142dfae087c450546f26563 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 5:01 PM, Neal Cardwell wrote: > On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 3:54 PM, Hans-Kristian Bakke > wrote: > >> Hi >> >> Kernel 4.9 finally landed in Debian testing so I could finally test BBR >> in a real life environment that I have struggled with getting any kind of >> performance out of. >> > BTW, these kinds of posts are ideal for the bbr-dev list, if you have any future test reports or discussion items: https://groups.google.com/d/forum/bbr-dev Thanks, neal --001a1142dfae087c450546f26563 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On W= ed, Jan 25, 2017 at 5:01 PM, Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>= ; wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 3:54 PM, Hans-Kristian Bakke <hkbakke= @gmail.com> wrote:
H= i

Kernel 4.9 finally landed in Debian tes= ting so I could finally test BBR in a real life environment that I have str= uggled with getting any kind of performance out of.

BTW, these kinds= of posts are ideal for the bbr-dev list, if you have any future test repor= ts or discussion items:


Thanks,
neal

--001a1142dfae087c450546f26563--