From: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: "Steinar H. Gunderson" <sgunderson@bigfoot.com>,
Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>,
"aqm@ietf.org" <aqm@ietf.org>,
bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Bloat] TCP BBR paper is now generally available
Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2016 08:03:50 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CADVnQym9iPJ+GR7BN9fPRe3on_j=OxUD0D83DS6Dzf1xLKvtnA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1480721486.18162.392.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>
Thanks for the report, Steinar. This is the first report we've had
like this, but it would be interesting to find out what's going on.
Even if you don't have time to apply the patches Eric mentions, it
would be hugely useful if the next time you have a slow transfer like
that you could post a link to a tcpdump packet capture (headers only
is best, say -s 120). Ideally the trace would capture a whole
connection, so we can see the wscale on the SYN exchange.
thanks,
neal
On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 6:31 PM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-12-02 at 23:40 +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 05:22:23PM -0500, Neal Cardwell wrote:
>> > Of course, if we find important use cases that don't work with BBR, we will
>> > see what we can do to make BBR work well with them.
>>
>> I have one thing that I _wonder_ if could be BBR's fault: I run backup over
>> SSH. (That would be tar + gzip + ssh.) The first full backup after I rolled
>> out BBR on the server (the one sending the data) suddenly was very slow
>> (~50 Mbit/sec); there was plenty of free I/O, and neither tar nor gzip
>> (well, pigz) used a full core. My only remaining explanation would be that
>> somehow, BBR didn't deal well with the irregular stream of data coming from
>> tar. (A wget between the same machines at the same time gave 6-700 Mbit/sec.)
>>
>> I will not really blame BBR here, since I didn't take a tcpdump or have time
>> to otherwise debug properly (short of eliminating the other things I already
>> mentioned); most likely, it's something else. But if you've ever heard of
>> others with similar issues, consider this a second report. :-)
>>
>> /* Steinar */
>
> It would be interesting to get the chrono stats for the TCP flow, with
> an updated ss/iproute2 command and the kernel patches :
>
> efd90174167530c67a54273fd5d8369c87f9bd32 tcp: export sender limits chronographs to TCP_INFO
> b0f71bd3e190df827d25d7f19bf09037567f14b7 tcp: instrument how long TCP is limited by insufficient send buffer
> 5615f88614a47d2b802e1d14d31b623696109276 tcp: instrument how long TCP is limited by receive window
> 0f87230d1a6c253681550c6064715d06a32be73d tcp: instrument how long TCP is busy sending
> 05b055e89121394058c75dc354e9a46e1e765579 tcp: instrument tcp sender limits chronographs
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-03 13:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-02 15:52 Dave Taht
2016-12-02 19:15 ` Aaron Wood
2016-12-02 20:32 ` Jonathan Morton
2016-12-02 22:22 ` Neal Cardwell
2016-12-02 22:40 ` Steinar H. Gunderson
2016-12-02 23:31 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-12-03 13:03 ` Neal Cardwell [this message]
2016-12-03 19:13 ` Steinar H. Gunderson
2016-12-03 20:20 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-12-03 20:26 ` Jonathan Morton
2016-12-03 21:07 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-12-03 21:34 ` Steinar H. Gunderson
2016-12-03 21:50 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-12-03 22:13 ` Steinar H. Gunderson
2016-12-03 22:55 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-12-03 23:02 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-12-03 23:09 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-12-03 23:03 ` Steinar H. Gunderson
2016-12-03 23:15 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-12-03 23:24 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-12-04 3:18 ` Neal Cardwell
2016-12-04 8:44 ` Steinar H. Gunderson
2016-12-04 17:13 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-12-04 17:38 ` Steinar H. Gunderson
2016-12-06 17:20 ` Steinar H. Gunderson
2016-12-06 21:31 ` Neal Cardwell
2016-12-03 21:38 ` Jonathan Morton
2016-12-03 21:33 ` Steinar H. Gunderson
2016-12-07 16:28 ` Alan Jenkins
2016-12-07 16:47 ` Steinar H. Gunderson
2016-12-07 17:03 ` Alan Jenkins
2016-12-08 8:24 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2016-12-08 13:22 ` Dave Täht
2016-12-08 14:01 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2016-12-08 21:29 ` Neal Cardwell
2016-12-08 22:31 ` Yuchung Cheng
2016-12-09 14:52 ` Klatsky, Carl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CADVnQym9iPJ+GR7BN9fPRe3on_j=OxUD0D83DS6Dzf1xLKvtnA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=ncardwell@google.com \
--cc=aqm@ietf.org \
--cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=chromatix99@gmail.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=sgunderson@bigfoot.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox