General list for discussing Bufferbloat
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hans-Kristian Bakke <hkbakke@gmail.com>
To: bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Bloat] sch_fq, pacing and inconsistent TSO continued...
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 18:51:54 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAD_cGvE2QCPpcaSg=wW4mR7-1c6XLWpbAzedornfd22QvT8AQg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAD_cGvE+LYmiswo53yqDMZVKgrJrSdUz73d0_cLMZ-PMLi7=SA@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4963 bytes --]

Yep.. downgrading systemd from 232.15 to 231.10 fixed it.

There you have it. Systemd 232 not only got the ability to set offloads,
but it also disables tx-tcp-segmentation by default for both physical NICs
and bonds.

These packages from Debian Snapshots did the trick:
libsystemd0_231-10_amd64.deb
libudev1_231-10_amd64.deb
systemd_231-10_amd64.deb
udev_231-10_amd64.deb

This is ...fun.... No wonder file my server performance got more unreliable
the last couple of months.


On 13 February 2017 at 18:39, Hans-Kristian Bakke <hkbakke@gmail.com> wrote:

> After some further testing i see that this is not igb specific! Also bond
> interfaces and e1000e have tso disabled like this:
>
> tx-tcp-segmentation: off
> tx-tcp-mangleid-segmentation: off [requested on]
>
> bonded vlan interfaces however have tso enabled, but again vlan interfaces
> seems to have everything enabled.
>
> As downgrading the kernel to a known good did not do the trick there must
> be something else systemwide in Debian Stretch. Perhaps I should really try
> to get all the dependencies together to downgrade systemd.
>
> Regards,
> Hans-Kristian
>
> On 13 February 2017 at 17:54, Hans-Kristian Bakke <hkbakke@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> In a previous thread on this mailing list (Excessive throttling with fq)
>> it was concluded that the reason for the bad performance was that tso was
>> somewhat inconcistent between the bond and the physical interfaces. I never
>> really knew why, but I knew I had been experimenting with traffic shaping
>> and offloads so I naturally thought that was the culprit.
>>
>> However, I have now rebooted some of my systems and in both of my Debian
>> Stretch (testing) systems (I tried both kernel 4.8 and 4.9, one with
>> fq_codel and one with sch_fq) I end up with this combination of
>> segmentation offload settings:
>>
>> ...
>> tcp-segmentation-offload: on
>>         tx-tcp-segmentation: off <---- ???
>>         tx-tcp-ecn-segmentation: off [fixed]
>>         tx-tcp-mangleid-segmentation: off
>>         tx-tcp6-segmentation: on
>> udp-fragmentation-offload: off [fixed]
>> generic-segmentation-offload: on
>> ...
>>
>> If I do the following...
>> ethtool -K eth0 tx-tcp-segmentation on
>>
>> ...I end up with what I expect and the performance returns for sch_fq
>> with pacing.
>> ...
>> tcp-segmentation-offload: on
>>         tx-tcp-segmentation: on
>>         tx-tcp-ecn-segmentation: off [fixed]
>>         tx-tcp-mangleid-segmentation: off
>>         tx-tcp6-segmentation: on
>> udp-fragmentation-offload: off [fixed]
>> generic-segmentation-offload: on
>> ...
>>
>> I have some other Debian Jessie systems also using the igb-driver and tso
>> is always enabled here by default (but not the same NIC). (Kernel 3.16)
>>
>> I also have a Proxmox VE system on kernel 4.4 with exactly the same quad
>> NIC that i suspect do not use the kernel source igb-drivers as it has a lot
>> more params that also has tso enabled correctly.
>>
>> # Proxmox VE system (full TSO by default)
>> #ethtool -i eth1
>> driver: igb
>> version: 5.3.5.3
>> firmware-version: 3.19, 0x00013cbf
>> bus-info: 0000:03:00.1
>> supports-statistics: yes
>> supports-test: yes
>> supports-eeprom-access: yes
>> supports-register-dump: yes
>> supports-priv-flags: no
>>
>> # Debian Stretch systems (half-enabled TSO by default)
>> # ethtool -i eth2
>> driver: igb
>> version: 5.4.0-k
>> firmware-version: 0.0.0
>> expansion-rom-version:
>> bus-info: 0000:00:14.2
>> supports-statistics: yes
>> supports-test: yes
>> supports-eeprom-access: yes
>> supports-register-dump: yes
>> supports-priv-flags: no
>>
>> The NIC that the "working" and the "non-working" system have is HP
>> NC365T, which is based on intel 82580.
>> The other "non-working" Debian Stretch system is a Intel Rangeley Atom
>> c2758 supermicros system with a quad intel I354 network controller embedded.
>>
>> I tried booting the stretch system with kernel 3.16 from Debian Jessie to
>> get the same drivers like my working systems but no change. Then I noticed
>> that systemd got the ability to change exactly these offloads in the last
>> systemd version 232 which arrived in testing in the end of 2016 so I am
>> thinking that this might have something to do with this, but I have not
>> found anything (mostly because I don't even really know where to look)
>>
>> I also tried to not having one of the interfaces in any kind of bond or
>> vlan subinterface in case those were changing some stuff but no changes in
>> behaviour.
>>
>> So to my questions:
>> - Can anyone think of a reason why tx-tcp-segmentation offload is
>> disabled by default (and not tcp segmentation offload in general)
>> - Do you have any tips to troubleshoot this?
>> - As this default combination of out-of-the-box settings is bad for fq
>> with pacing performance, and it seems to somewhat be the default now for
>> two different igb-systems I thought I should give you a heads up.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Hans-Kristian
>>
>
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 8731 bytes --]

      reply	other threads:[~2017-02-13 17:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-13 16:54 Hans-Kristian Bakke
2017-02-13 17:39 ` Hans-Kristian Bakke
2017-02-13 17:51   ` Hans-Kristian Bakke [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAD_cGvE2QCPpcaSg=wW4mR7-1c6XLWpbAzedornfd22QvT8AQg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=hkbakke@gmail.com \
    --cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox