Re: [Bloat] Realtime Response Under Load (RRUL) Test

[sahil grover <sahilgrover013@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1487 bytes --]

>Contact me off-list if you want a deeper discussion of the history of
bufferbloat and what's going on to try and solve it.

Sure, i will. You made my day  :)
because by reading papers/articles, i didn't get that i gained from you
people.
Infact always wanna hear something like this.

So Thanks a lot for being so kind.


On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 9:15 PM, David Lang <david@lang.hm> wrote:

> On Mon, 20 Apr 2015, sahil grover wrote:
>
>  David Sir,
>>
>> Thanks for answering.
>>
>> can you please tell me how to interpret its output?
>>
>> By   "netperf-wrapper rrul netperf.bufferbloat.net" ( i chose netserver
>> that is running on netperf.bufferbloat.net)
>> output(result.png) is attached.
>>
>> please tell me first what does it say generally?
>> secondly,  anything related with bufferbloat point of view.
>>
>
> latency should not increase significantly under load. The fact that it
> does indicates that you have a problem. The fact that the latency can
> increase to multi-second values for many people indicates a big problem.
>
> take a look at the new test that's available at
> https://www.dslreports.com/speedtest and then look at the results tab and
> see how the latency increases during the download and upload tests.
>
> If you have a system without excessive buffering, you would not see
> massive increases in latency.
>
> Contact me off-list if you want a deeper discussion of the history of
> bufferbloat and what's going on to try and solve it.
>
> David Lang
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2336 bytes --]