From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-la0-x233.google.com (mail-la0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A305721F41C for ; Fri, 6 Mar 2015 01:15:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by labgq15 with SMTP id gq15so2391376lab.13 for ; Fri, 06 Mar 2015 01:15:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=vabOWOW2c1aP0Q0FW+FJVOG8Dv2EUQl3vS28y57FDr4=; b=gP071tbll0K2a6AQL1ggrd/CFl52QAiuWN0+v4SeskcOan559EgUp8aqU6i9WyObVx C0uH34SWQw6NMZQyjBEo4zVVP/7JN9X1EA7ZHKaJkZAFORjNtYEJiCvs/P/a4Grq5Zbw Yo1+BmoaQWydwE5XZLV0TeGk9zvZPZCtIBSeUqm1cu9F0JBjHPUHQ4ngp76VdN5MMJAL RB7eI4rmBf5cA/nHjib3xqbeNrRO03BrrSSU9pxqASy94kIdDwqlSRLEs+dvf7hozX6r cLCzARR4OW1zLHZKtMjgt88q214Vkr+pUGzxoABq3+bumY2A66kZzQwCJpJOy3G3d0X3 +Pnw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.8.101 with SMTP id q5mr5914070lba.19.1425633332890; Fri, 06 Mar 2015 01:15:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.25.147.75 with HTTP; Fri, 6 Mar 2015 01:15:32 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 14:45:32 +0530 Message-ID: From: sahil grover To: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1134df9663109105109b20a2 Subject: [Bloat] suggestions for enhancing AQM X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2015 09:16:04 -0000 --001a1134df9663109105109b20a2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi For my research work ,i want to enhance AQM. And i was thinking to improve CoDel by managing UDP flows because it allocates disproportionate share of bandwidth to tcp's when misbehaving UDP flows are there(transmitting data at very high rate). And when i checked with sfq_CoDel,this problem is resolved. It maintains the throughput of tcp's. So can anybody tell me limitations of codel ,sfq_codel so that i can work on it. or any suggestions to make CoDel,Sfq_CoDel even better. Please keep in mind, right now i can work only on ns2. And i want each and everyone to share their ideas ,it would be useful for all please reply. Thanks --001a1134df9663109105109b20a2 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi=C2=A0

For my research work ,i want to enhance AQM.
=

And i was thinking to improve CoDel by managing UDP = flows because it allocates=C2=A0disproportionate share of bandwidth to tcp&= #39;s when misbehaving UDP flows are there(transmitting data at very high r= ate).

And when i checked with sfq_CoDel,this pr= oblem is resolved. It maintains the throughput of tcp's.

So can anybody tell me limitations of codel ,sfq_codel so tha= t i can work on it.

or any suggestions to make = CoDel,Sfq_CoDel even better.

Please keep in min= d, right now i can work only on ns2.

And i want= =C2=A0each and everyone to =C2=A0share their ideas ,it would be =C2=A0usef= ul for all=C2=A0

please reply.

Thanks
--001a1134df9663109105109b20a2--