From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-vc0-x233.google.com (mail-vc0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c03::233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 840EB21F1E0 for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 17:31:08 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-vc0-f179.google.com with SMTP id hz11so6084811vcb.24 for ; Tue, 05 Nov 2013 17:31:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=jDxJi7qiGRTixShVNoc3zqpDd3AaQvlkpkQAFQertSA=; b=dgxiwc4F9+yjyjsaOa2Aq1p8vHlZTtxf1ERg12MuW61NcCanHGrd+bHXvR5Im1kYwy G9vAp3StLvtPy8vPTQmQN7ZmO9lh/+BkNYdi7OQ+NtJbsZrbJGbYeeEeSP71V7BSmSus CAS72QUVxXvQGSRNIDlW85scS+cjKvXCf8FiBIMnVcJN8tfTsZR9SaLnjqlnHr668hSI 4cD51C4vXccvSzhDznnsvF9Au6hbU9Cy0wn9U/7LDhEFBYolP+9tyV9JPAcz0zgH4OOH GOjam9kf4bG83FBbd/Z5zxBYULqk9SE1sx0Cto2vBGcobd/MQPtU9pe4KZZ14idl9qAu B+LQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.58.29.37 with SMTP id g5mr282571veh.38.1383701466967; Tue, 05 Nov 2013 17:31:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.109.5 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 17:31:06 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2013 17:31:06 -0800 Message-ID: From: Naeem Khademi To: "aqm@ietf.org" , bloat , "iccrg@irtf.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b6786fe69f60f04ea781a96 Subject: [Bloat] New AQM Kids on the block -- experimental evaluation of CoDel and PIE (and ARED) X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 01:31:08 -0000 --047d7b6786fe69f60f04ea781a96 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi This might be of interest of some of AQMers: The slides of ICCRG talk at IETF88 comparing the performance of CoDel, PIE and ARED is available at: http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/88/slides/slides-88-iccrg-4.pdf A detailed technical report with more experimental results can be found at: http://urn.nb.no/URN:NBN:no-38868 Please don't hesitate to provide feedback. Regards, Naeem --047d7b6786fe69f60f04ea781a96 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi=A0

This might be of interest of some of AQMers:

The slide= s of ICCRG talk at IETF88 comparing the performance of CoDel, PIE and ARED = is available at:=A0http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/88/slides/slides-88-icc= rg-4.pdf

A detailed technical report with more ex= perimental results can be found at:=A0http://urn.nb.no/URN:NBN:no-38868

Please don't=A0hesitate=A0to provide feedback.=A0
<= font face=3D"arial, helvetica, sans-serif">
Regards,
Naeem
=


=
--047d7b6786fe69f60f04ea781a96--