From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-vb0-x230.google.com (mail-vb0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c02::230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47E6B21F107 for ; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 09:29:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-vb0-f48.google.com with SMTP id w16so3122808vbf.21 for ; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 09:29:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ur+iCqlorcjaAGTu3ZPngPdMzY+N9TSiaRDhb95TKbY=; b=L5/5dH6e2ERQ8DtEm36/1M/nuQvnGwUdw3rHxd/ML1T21SlW63NRQmxFaAOqwnUxuN woVPk/ZlU2AziK9q05HhbAMvhy62sTOe3h6ODStPbvvDmDB9KcSKx/4IGE7XOz+4LjbS Llgcyok744X+DEcZNumkroDFZiJ9K5kQaCzPkNJ4GPefaK1C1at+Eoq86NX3EVlzcZ9l +kL89kZtPQ4vfgoVyTZHIH/XkdzXkSlveAN2URuFrUel2PRLXxOpFVT7WeMB7ifeHZJa OTWUu87Cz7Po0wzeIeN3AEFT02SubHD2Xg3+cf/i3AVRsciibGbfBygSNSETCgVgBuXR n+fA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.52.73.162 with SMTP id m2mr7519251vdv.24.1377620958172; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 09:29:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.221.51.198 with HTTP; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 09:29:18 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 18:29:18 +0200 Message-ID: From: Naeem Khademi To: Dave Taht , bloat , edumazet@google.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: [Bloat] SFQRED or SFQARED? X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 16:29:19 -0000 Hi Slide 37 of below link mentions that SFQRED implemented in Linux 3.4 upwards, "Utilized a better version of RED (=93ARED=94) from Sally Floyd in 2002". However I'm unable to find the "adaptive" bit of SFQRED in the kernel and iproute code. Can anyone (Dave or Eric) confirm that the mentioned statement is correct? http://netseminar.stanford.edu/seminars/Inside_Codel_and_Fq_Codel.pdf Regards, Naeem