From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-vc0-x22b.google.com (mail-vc0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c03::22b]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 051C021F1F5 for ; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 21:35:05 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-vc0-f171.google.com with SMTP id ik5so2356988vcb.16 for ; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 21:35:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=XqtLbLNXgFgannlouiwyVB9Ju0EPrsc0IIjFUL8Hjww=; b=v8e7qU0LRBq1YOexufwXPIZP+mZY4fk8Me3lL0C77Bw4ZA4L9s0wDu4C1VGN1Trck8 csExkCzIzxJMuOud52wNtA9OtpEcc0QvLiW4N6licbuUetn+r9Eqd5pLD1RAY3jwefZi BDFOkQMuH3PvNj8hkZtyFEDCTdk8V2HAlYA1Dy+RNt5D/2C5s+czwxjctFslvgMeIUPe KZMXsIuKioNu9Q69+oKwrxwS+oMDkc1RpNdiBDA9BUD2ZTuJi+Dy3dGCIkvZwDu3riDB p6vq9rOcswqhlMyDp/x6A88Vd51QC2uBTQulomvXaA9ivEy24VWvsc7hqct/zFE13ONK ICbA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.52.191.98 with SMTP id gx2mr14309vdc.71.1387085704917; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 21:35:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.221.5.196 with HTTP; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 21:35:04 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 06:35:04 +0100 Message-ID: From: Naeem Khademi To: "aqm@ietf.org" , bloat , end2end-interest@postel.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0122e75ab6faa004ed8c0e28 Subject: [Bloat] What is a good burst? -- AQM evaluation guidelines X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 05:35:06 -0000 --089e0122e75ab6faa004ed8c0e28 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi all I'm not sure if this has already been covered in any of the other threads, but looking at http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/88/slides/slides-88-aqm-5.pdfand draft-ietf-aqm-recommendation-00, the question remains: "what is a good burst (size) that AQMs should allow?" and/or "how an AQM can have a notion of the right burst size?". and how "naturally-occuring bursts" mentioned in draft-ietf-aqm-recommendation-00 can be defined? Regards, Naeem --089e0122e75ab6faa004ed8c0e28 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi all=A0

I'm not sure if this has = already been covered in any of the other threads, but looking at http://www.= ietf.org/proceedings/88/slides/slides-88-aqm-5.pdf and=A0draft-ietf-aqm= -recommendation-00, the question remains: "what is a good burst (size)= that AQMs should allow?" and/or "how an AQM can have a notion of= the right burst size?".=A0

and how=A0"naturally-occur= ing bursts" mentioned in=A0draft-ietf-aqm-recommendation-00 can= be defined?=A0


Regards,
Naeem=A0
--089e0122e75ab6faa004ed8c0e28--