Re: [Bloat] Multiple WAN ports & SQM?

[Arie <nospam@ariekanarie.nl>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1285 bytes --]

Already mentioned in other replies, but you can just run SQM on the
separate links and load balance those using mwan3. These are my mwan3 rules
to balance a BVVDSL and DOCSIS connection:  https://i.imgur.com/eAd4Bl5.png

Unsticky for ports that can be safely balanced without stickiness (e.g.
steam downloads on port 80)
CB is the cable modem
sticky_even for consistent HTTPS connections based on even LAN IP
sticky_odd for consistent HTTPS connections based on odd LAN IP
default_rule balances everything else across the links with a 10m sticky
timeout



On Sun, 3 May 2020 at 16:23, Rich Brown <richb.hanover@gmail.com> wrote:

> Given the crummy internet service in my area (DSL, max of 15mbps/1mbps), I
> wonder if we could improve things by getting a second connection from our
> ISP and "bonding" the two links together in my OpenWrt router.
>
> I see both Multiwan (which is self-described as old) and mwan3.
>
> But neither would seem to offer the kinds of latency control
> (SQM/fq_codel/cake) that the cool kids in networking have come to expect.
>
> Any recommendations from this group for such an effort? Thanks.
>
> Rich
> _______________________________________________
> Bloat mailing list
> Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1919 bytes --]