From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-yb1-f182.google.com (mail-yb1-f182.google.com [209.85.219.182]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2FB043B29D for ; Sun, 3 May 2020 10:46:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-yb1-f182.google.com with SMTP id f5so1505241ybo.4 for ; Sun, 03 May 2020 07:46:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=4Kq5HuW/ybRPuj/LE5TIia4DkJf3V4foVr4G80K7paM=; b=NY8slXynxpqQxOM2eC6GXhZp7laHcoFwewPweb1Ko96oNjpmd7ZjiAe/eQpXKPJUf7 N/82nZM498lOx2bjQ+xiZMlIG4I3DxgqXbGeYfptRnGWG7K0sLt0igozbNn+7l2Q/cg/ rt9yBcveJx74l3L4QaOlTOXrZJtlkPFafNBTjkLzsUcYClAGf0D+wUxzD6DIlrvIsCgm 3eLfar0nY8rTqcApDSw/5O0VUAAq+tp2FwITzAES20a7HMrbPiDFpcwCnnKPeTIRbbMJ 3xy/0/NqB5XKTD0Rm96LCA2bCa12L/GkqP/BmREsjCWXEJZ6VZC3AJ2Atf8Y7m1m0Ow4 8Rmw== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuZsdcWlWVVKiFw1+zY1NfVOyMm7MYajuFS/eSTrYUbWwJs5boMF xMUTcDDHM5R7ztN4wZjyUfqh3edcWAjq7C8WkffSQsERp+U= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypKS7oeM0JoqJ95ouyAXVHmw9w9dR5IwuxLWbK8QqfqhmGmQPPk3U/+moIax4IlFzvtie5pcM6Zi+pDbhEzEu0Q= X-Received: by 2002:a25:c287:: with SMTP id s129mr1836709ybf.337.1588517190527; Sun, 03 May 2020 07:46:30 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <3764C024-5F18-41C8-98F0-9FA423ED5860@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <3764C024-5F18-41C8-98F0-9FA423ED5860@gmail.com> From: Arie Date: Sun, 3 May 2020 16:46:20 +0200 Message-ID: To: Rich Brown Cc: bloat Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000dc876705a4bf7a4a" Subject: Re: [Bloat] Multiple WAN ports & SQM? X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 May 2020 14:46:31 -0000 --000000000000dc876705a4bf7a4a Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Already mentioned in other replies, but you can just run SQM on the separate links and load balance those using mwan3. These are my mwan3 rules to balance a BVVDSL and DOCSIS connection: https://i.imgur.com/eAd4Bl5.png Unsticky for ports that can be safely balanced without stickiness (e.g. steam downloads on port 80) CB is the cable modem sticky_even for consistent HTTPS connections based on even LAN IP sticky_odd for consistent HTTPS connections based on odd LAN IP default_rule balances everything else across the links with a 10m sticky timeout On Sun, 3 May 2020 at 16:23, Rich Brown wrote: > Given the crummy internet service in my area (DSL, max of 15mbps/1mbps), I > wonder if we could improve things by getting a second connection from our > ISP and "bonding" the two links together in my OpenWrt router. > > I see both Multiwan (which is self-described as old) and mwan3. > > But neither would seem to offer the kinds of latency control > (SQM/fq_codel/cake) that the cool kids in networking have come to expect. > > Any recommendations from this group for such an effort? Thanks. > > Rich > _______________________________________________ > Bloat mailing list > Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat > --000000000000dc876705a4bf7a4a Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Already mentioned in other replies, but you can just run S= QM on the separate links and load balance those using mwan3. These are my m= wan3 rules to balance a BVVDSL and DOCSIS connection:=C2=A0 https://i.imgur.com/eAd4Bl5.png=

Unsticky for ports that can be safely balanced with= out stickiness (e.g. steam downloads on port 80)
CB is the cable = modem
sticky_even for consistent=C2=A0HTTPS connections based on = even LAN IP
sticky_odd for consistent HTTPS connections based on = odd LAN IP
default_rule balances everything else across the links= with a 10m sticky timeout


On Sun, 3= May 2020 at 16:23, Rich Brown <richb.hanover@gmail.com> wrote:
Given the crummy internet service in my area (DSL= , max of 15mbps/1mbps), I wonder if we could improve things by getting a se= cond connection from our ISP and "bonding" the two links together= in my OpenWrt router.

I see both Multiwan (which is self-described as old) and mwan3.

But neither would seem to offer the kinds of latency control (SQM/fq_codel/= cake) that the cool kids in networking have come to expect.

Any recommendations from this group for such an effort? Thanks.

Rich
_______________________________________________
Bloat mailing list
Bloat@list= s.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
--000000000000dc876705a4bf7a4a--