From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <blanquicet@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-lf1-x130.google.com (mail-lf1-x130.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::130])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2445A3CB35
 for <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Tue, 26 May 2020 10:51:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x130.google.com with SMTP id 82so12488280lfh.2
 for <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Tue, 26 May 2020 07:51:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to
 :cc; bh=q44dR1+I0Y9Xxr59leScSA+n0hD8WssUSBsvuQe+feE=;
 b=o+rdY0NZdql9N/qnM++ZZF3CTehA0nfwasClSS3Br2KEjefazkgon1OLIedKao5kTZ
 XMx/J5UX7aeK0qZ6CzPyXs9meYAeUXPkqhcbPFOAO904ug/qvsw/mp+TZge+vx0khVtA
 oAD7SftCNlrrPYc5AZ/dozPCczicqw/TLxRpq2Xv+oLaVGbZ+DsQw4hBqGxdprFBqhAX
 O9/yacJNEQbh4ThrUZ+o0fx+w5GTeghpZQRbL83+hwa5b1iX+cDc7cayucvF5PkLmXju
 WqAHWiGW2vFMqxe+sT9kTOjM7uXtoBixQJA+ZOURYuUzsL4lINRajtkvfUHtGQ5Pt6a0
 THCA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to:cc;
 bh=q44dR1+I0Y9Xxr59leScSA+n0hD8WssUSBsvuQe+feE=;
 b=NHbUNcVxwVViM/cdn8/CZa0YPwC7rcw1Pjbg5zNixzUy3pIFlOopVVJWzwHQs5W637
 eMpeGoOMrxcEnINMVO4tce0bE2PQISl6JXxPoP3vefW1shnyazhtWBRxYbs05qr7uslQ
 W6rM8FRUrGzdoUQPs/9NRbKbjhnIWt8pdcp0AKAXGlvQaRpSXBiBL0QbDph9JkunlDFZ
 KcRuNu2TBUWyEARijSwelXicyuXmSWchAzjf9hFJNENx0wo++fqveC5OjhFUtD95WAHF
 GAdYtAGhtlBWY7SBAGO9Efkm31+NqzhdPSWTMAWgrR6Dd/8zYEgngz3mB1ky17aBFyoN
 eNdw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533SBqqVlByPtliVRTGGnFSgJQW3ABl5Q3/g/x8gumpSYNtrWU37
 UWI3JcUN4yCe6jbC2bVGoKG+BnrI7VaNSSPOPUQ=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwtjJM+Qeb7QSTiUnwQ6XMJybYvRCR8CXrPJusm0VWEVzU8WKJQhZEChWR1tWIuU9Y5CJDcsVtXNuHnhYbTohc=
X-Received: by 2002:ac2:4143:: with SMTP id c3mr686088lfi.131.1590504661009;
 Tue, 26 May 2020 07:51:01 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAFC8iJL-yJqbfOvJwqnP2AxP8DnyQvF_-DaOngV-fwhcdCdLRA@mail.gmail.com>
 <mailman.433.1590494678.24343.bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
In-Reply-To: <mailman.433.1590494678.24343.bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
From: Jose Blanquicet <blanquicet@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 16:50:24 +0200
Message-ID: <CAFC8iJJ5s=0Z9eZN-4SJS6_b_NdWoc=hKUR+uLSr2r=Zn-v==Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Y <intruder_tkyf@yahoo.fr>
Cc: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Subject: Re: [Bloat] CPU consumption using TC-TBF and TC-POLICE to limit rate
X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat <bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/bloat>,
 <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat>
List-Post: <mailto:bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat>,
 <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 14:51:02 -0000

Hi Yutaka,

Thanks for your response.

On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 2:04 PM Y via Bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
> I heard that IBF costs cpu load.

Sorry but what do you mean with "IBF"?

> How about shaping only egress with TBF?

It was our very first option but limiting traffic with this is costing
too much CPU in our system with limited CPU resources (Check the
results in my first email). So we found that we are sacrificing too
much rate to get few points of free CPU and that's why I am here
asking for suggestions.

Thanks,
Jose