FYI, I'm not seeing a DKIM signature from the list server? (in gmail)

Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=neutral (body hash did not
verify) header.i=@toke.dk; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for
domain of bloat-bounces@lists.bufferbloat.net designates
2600:3c03::f03c:91ff:fe61:86ce as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=
bloat-bounces@lists.bufferbloat.net; dmarc=fail (p=NONE dis=NONE)
header.from=toke.dk

Looks like lists.bufferbloat.net has an SPF record now though, yay :)

On Sun, 30 Oct 2016 at 15:56 David Collier-Brown <davec-b@rogers.com> wrote:

On 30/10/16 02:48 PM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> The mail server at lists.bufferbloat.net should now be DKIM-signing
> outgoing email. This is a test of that; please ignore. :)
>
> -Toke
> _______________________________________________
> Bloat mailing list
> Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
I ran it through spamcop and it passed, so it's structurally OK.
--dave

A few lines make it look like you're experimenting (;-))

Received-SPF: none (domain of lists.bufferbloat.net does not designate
permitted sender hosts)

Received: from lists.bufferbloat.net (lists.bufferbloat.net [45.79.142.77])
     (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
     (No client certificate requested)
     by vmx5.spamcop.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84FF3ED1CE
     for <x>; Sun, 30 Oct 2016 11:48:56 -0700 (PDT)

X-Original-To: x
Delivered-To: x

--
David Collier-Brown,         | Always do right. This will gratify
System Programmer and Author | some people and astonish the rest
davecb@spamcop.net           |                      -- Mark Twain

_______________________________________________
Bloat mailing list
Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat