From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-io0-x230.google.com (mail-io0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 889653B260 for ; Sun, 3 Jul 2016 18:34:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-io0-x230.google.com with SMTP id f30so139825307ioj.2 for ; Sun, 03 Jul 2016 15:34:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to; bh=zA5XA+5DHV7wsv29vV8Cwx9MJFP076KyKU1uCurDnlk=; b=IcpEM/mDWQuYLDeRgg+MFe5+A4hAu7+gNxEcsosLo/cYZvGztLNVa85kY+4fRzOTa6 EA4NmtPne9zCUiSVlqJzCb/Nb3h8qN/Xfp0yIetDInvKJ73YyoJnftuAgWePfSFgMIPJ 4KYHr30T7gSfDyuR9gaCrpegCe4I/IbmxWVjlGmgY1jrYGJoFOB5ktCNSN3SxU1wqviq zXsJWlQZuEvRDPr3FtwyEafqLYH3zdjI8zbqwZ+lDPe4L5vtLVkTN2y4w2NOuzgPPoYK v7ieqqRlQMFrW1OXqU7xSaswQ5QMenwvANBXXNwYOA0wEeMQdajePpUuwPfN45c6Qw6n WELA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to; bh=zA5XA+5DHV7wsv29vV8Cwx9MJFP076KyKU1uCurDnlk=; b=FT3iAqmrWNPEHnDlNIwcXBf3Mromuvyz8gLOCtqxboyyYkKIjsfs22qa09QMLVjuZO QoRbBWZhf9ugTFScLAxVZfPpjVl6v4aArE31aESmJEl8wOJAYme/U8houIYUOUfU7ZHu H9ge8gdoZ700tZd8dUnXEKcECL152Pu4JHQDPxzycL+5Enoh1QH6PWi4hYPtT2WagJK1 VbnD32vWsHOidYuPSyKJaif8/2or7ZYB2mdWMKR6bY+LMMm43RUvIcM+XtSOsllFz2RE 5/m32c76luZaRInGuMq0YepWuOWyK1ZjFc9fiYkq59MtmBF087Y+qaWz2VGiOsH1/cex 4cLw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tJxh3HpQgwl4MC2pwDFDE2750/7PRtX698P5jEIMYpK/sgcATKUg/SPnVoKZX9Ma3oyp6iglcATyBzLgQ== X-Received: by 10.107.201.193 with SMTP id z184mr6189135iof.120.1467585241936; Sun, 03 Jul 2016 15:34:01 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: white.phoenix@gmail.com Received: by 10.50.243.13 with HTTP; Sun, 3 Jul 2016 15:33:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: leetminiwheat X-Google-Sender-Auth: Ft_GrPJsgQ3IrwVM7zn66IUtH9U Message-ID: To: bloat Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c0b7dba05f7b50536c2d1c1 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 12:52:10 -0400 Subject: Re: [Bloat] Any non-bloaty 4port or 8port GigE switches? X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2016 22:34:02 -0000 X-Original-Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2016 18:33:32 -0400 X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2016 22:34:02 -0000 --94eb2c0b7dba05f7b50536c2d1c1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sorry again for the noise, but maybe the old WNDR3800 can be repurposed for this? Not sure how to do bonding on it however or if it needs hardware support in the switch. I think 802.3ad link aggregation requires hardware support but most switches with those are likely bloaty? On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 6:29 PM, leetminiwheat wrote: > Hi, sorry for the noise here but can anyone recommend a decent non-bloated > 4port or 8port GigE switch? something supporting bonding/failover would be > a bonus but not a requirement. > > Thanks, > -LMW > --94eb2c0b7dba05f7b50536c2d1c1 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sorry again for the noise, but maybe the old WNDR3800 can = be repurposed for this? Not sure how to do bonding on it however or if it n= eeds hardware support in the switch. I think=C2=A0802.3ad link aggregation = requires hardware support but most switches with those are likely bloaty?

On Sun, Jul 3= , 2016 at 6:29 PM, leetminiwheat <LeetMiniWheat@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi, sorry fo= r the noise here but can anyone recommend a decent non-bloated 4port or 8po= rt GigE switch? something supporting bonding/failover would be a bonus but = not a requirement.

Thanks,
-LMW

--94eb2c0b7dba05f7b50536c2d1c1--