From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ig0-x232.google.com (mail-ig0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56A3221F277 for ; Sun, 26 Apr 2015 08:42:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by igblo3 with SMTP id lo3so45835460igb.1 for ; Sun, 26 Apr 2015 08:42:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=FQtt4lp2+9lRCXbkCftXfnoc8WvNUIInCC5ljcdQ82Y=; b=ogRSGd6gEoJvorBctniStfo5GR7t1YOTBro3bAVUInT9y1YiziZRJAczOHSvZAIE+A GVvtovQutzXvtAWNrTvvzb9judllCPCce5yy12ON+DwN6mS3J8tonPQxLLoKZbHECw5Y nBOwfezjvQmMfGd9T0rFSP9BYgxPDM7cgnIc0dUCWu4s512JSy1/MksNCLYwuRbRZbVA PEoR8Xl99AjxjAmeUH+si/pXnkCVHqT9oyGr3X0ucSE7Yt+NAOX3HNms+pA8gY4RXQoP +SCXxgQe0/DyiEvSmAA5ujEtVlP4wOjCXxZEc5ZCNYRSv0YaW7NuDHnDbKaDdWjcAmQ9 io8g== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.136.89 with SMTP id k86mr8662142iod.63.1430062935394; Sun, 26 Apr 2015 08:42:15 -0700 (PDT) Sender: justinbeech@gmail.com Received: by 10.50.107.42 with HTTP; Sun, 26 Apr 2015 08:42:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20150426152719.GB24211@sesse.net> References: <553B2863.2020600@gmail.com> <553BA193.1030907@gmail.com> <553C84FE.5070101@gmail.com> <20150426142336.GA24211@sesse.net> <20150426152719.GB24211@sesse.net> Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 01:42:15 +1000 X-Google-Sender-Auth: kvIgACKGOLENiTMaZY2EDWfe_Io Message-ID: From: jb To: "Steinar H. Gunderson" , bloat Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1145a0724552810514a2793d Subject: Re: [Bloat] Adblock - or another extension - is incorrectly blocking the speed test X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2015 15:42:51 -0000 --001a1145a0724552810514a2793d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 yes I can make that a preference setting, but it won't be a default (to use DNS). The amount of supporting work is considerable, I might put NAT64 on the 'nice to have' list for now. On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 1:27 AM, Steinar H. Gunderson < sgunderson@bigfoot.com> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 01:15:15AM +1000, jb wrote: > > If they are using NAT64, they can use an ipv6 speed test, natively, no ? > > > > "In general, NAT64 is designed to be used when the communication > > is initiated by IPv6 hosts." > > It could still be interesting to know how the IPv4 path holds up. > > /* Steinar */ > -- > Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/ > --001a1145a0724552810514a2793d Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
yes I can make that a preference setting, but it won't= be
a default (to use DNS).

The amount of supporting= work is considerable, I might
put NAT64 on the 'nice to have= ' list for now.

On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 1:27 AM, Steinar H. Gunderson <= span dir=3D"ltr"><sgunderson@bigfoot.com> wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 01:15:15AM +1000, jb wro= te:
> If they are using NAT64, they can use an ipv6 speed test, natively, no= ?
>
> "In general, NAT64 is designed to be used when the communication<= br> > is initiated by IPv6 hosts."

It could still be interesting to know how the IPv4 path holds up.

/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.se= sse.net/

--001a1145a0724552810514a2793d--