Oh, and if you are trying to reach the local speedtest.net speed, but select 4g, it is defaulting to 3 streams, and then only 1 up because of the old Firefox version, and is using servers in Netherlands and Germany. So if you try a current version of Firefox and/or Chrome, and want to push it, change in preferences streams down to 6 and streams up to 2 - 4 On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 5:57 PM, jb wrote: > Regarding > http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/380810 > > The upload graph was broken, or partially so, because you're using > Firefox/24.0 which dates from 2014 and apparently doesn't know how to > feedback information on the upload so the measurement was done from each > upload as it finished > > So that is why the upload graph is no good, but the upload number is about > right. > > Also it did have stalls and drops but not too bad, not enough to trigger > an error. > 46.98s 10hz drop stats frames=15 total ms=3985 > > > On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 5:22 PM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer > wrote: > >> >> On Tue, 28 Apr 2015 10:03:48 +0300 Marko Myllynen >> wrote: >> >> > On 2015-04-28 09:55, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote: >> > > >> > > Finally, there is a easy-to-use browser based speedtest that also >> > > measures bufferbloat: >> > > >> > > http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest >> > > >> > > After you run the test, click the green "Results + Share" button to >> see >> > > more detailed information. Which will contain a graph with "Ping >> > > response under load", which will indicate if you have bufferbloat on >> > > your link. >> > >> > FWIW, my results using RHEL 6 + Lenovo T420s + 4G modem: >> >> Thanks - I'm surprised to see how well 4G handles this. I was >> expecting to see higher delays under load. >> >> > http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/380810 >> >> The upload graph looks a little strange. >> >> > http://www.speedtest.net/my-result/4322094820 >> > >> > Speedtest has servers in Finland so that might explain a bit. I was >> > running two Fedora guest installations in the background during the >> > tests so the system was rather busy. >> >> Could you try to run this in a Chrome browser? >> The author (Cc'ed) sayed Firefox on Linux is too slow... >> >> -- >> Best regards, >> Jesper Dangaard Brouer >> MSc.CS, Sr. Network Kernel Developer at Red Hat >> Author of http://www.iptv-analyzer.org >> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer >> > >