From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ig0-x236.google.com (mail-ig0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C9FC21F2F5 for ; Fri, 22 May 2015 00:00:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by igbyr2 with SMTP id yr2so28783497igb.0 for ; Fri, 22 May 2015 00:00:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=/8sOB0CwlNdcyNTeFCYMieMKuxtJiqZOWzAt4G4Cq7U=; b=Qu7zeSxMsf6l4Gsck8RxwZ5EeKDZq+4VLK5Et1JQBFa5TS04JHK4U/Ev/0Z1uBiq2W CHnNYQFP/Bw43m6QAllBC6uIgaAtAqdspsqHk92wlSbhJA35upKopK/HJPhjfPE2fXun ClhKe+CpP9n+w6EQDkQi5vCiV57DNidhnv4UmSnKy2ey/NopaE/DylgM+e0PcSqPEYcG RYorCfFMAaBaMw8D8MYk77YpoaA80AzkrRbhUv21rgwMWLc6O2ZGU25F3Js4N85KE63O /YBa2veA7Ag9ZFDhw1v2mTl4gHHTpLkKmC2rowpR0GfliP/kDLfQ3ND9kYwO8Bhm9Ost QCWw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.79.196 with SMTP id l4mr3648279igx.48.1432278041346; Fri, 22 May 2015 00:00:41 -0700 (PDT) Sender: justinbeech@gmail.com Received: by 10.50.107.42 with HTTP; Fri, 22 May 2015 00:00:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8FFDE0DF-0F5A-4A3F-A47B-F8D59EEC7971@gmail.com> References: <58264BE0-CDBE-4739-B03D-4BAA20B13997@gmail.com> <8FFDE0DF-0F5A-4A3F-A47B-F8D59EEC7971@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 17:00:41 +1000 X-Google-Sender-Auth: tcNg132GMv1biK_cNEicpOge-QI Message-ID: From: jb To: bloat Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e01183f48dfcf340516a637df Subject: Re: [Bloat] dslreports mockup X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 07:01:11 -0000 --089e01183f48dfcf340516a637df Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Well the dual Y-Axis thing didn't work. It would require removal of the color bands and looked confusing. So I've done a drill-down thing instead. You get just three bars, then can drill into each by clicking, to see an expansion against its own Y-Axis. Hard to explain, easier to see: http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/525965 On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Jonathan Morton wrote: > > > On 22 May, 2015, at 03:17, jb wrote: > > > > Or I can just have two Y-Axis with auto-scaling on both. > > You could also try a square-root scale (as opposed to linear or > logarithmic). This should help with comparing data with different orders > of magnitude, without flattening things as aggressively as a log scale. > > But perhaps we should see what it looks like before committing to it. > > - Jonathan Morton > > --089e01183f48dfcf340516a637df Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Well the dual Y-Axis thing didn't work.
It would r= equire removal of the color bands and looked confusing.

So I've done a drill-down thing instead. You get just three bars,= then can=C2=A0
drill into each by clicking, to see an expansion = against its own Y-Axis.
Hard to explain, easier to see:


On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 10:56= AM, Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com> wrote:
<= blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-l= eft-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;pa= dding-left:1ex">
> On 22 May, 2015, at 03:17, jb <justin@dslr.net> wrote:
>
> Or I can just have two Y-Axis with auto-scaling on both.

You could also try a square-root scale (as opposed to linear or loga= rithmic).=C2=A0 This should help with comparing data with different orders = of magnitude, without flattening things as aggressively as a log scale.

But perhaps we should see what it looks like before committing to it.

=C2=A0- Jonathan Morton


--089e01183f48dfcf340516a637df--