From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ie0-x229.google.com (mail-ie0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1AF4921F41D for ; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 18:14:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by iecrt8 with SMTP id rt8so95185167iec.0 for ; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 18:14:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=R8Ptm3E+Ntz47RyZe11dbBwdsidqqImdoV7hNXAOKUU=; b=wyiKr7ogvg3RQtPRD2xG0gDuBgH4csIWFKJAknyY28kSJ8Xhikmu586U/tjn+k0PA5 No9dajVeix7vfmZwZPF9eaU3WnDGljtI3x0BKEAtdp+fqsnsIxQrLquRFML0uc8G1po0 i2SOskVYwmPcIVU0OYPVJanX0cb31qzjT3FvAndermWIY2y5CFRRvJ0KSv0BQjK5KNxI Fn9A2fdo2usExi0APfo4/6e7PxOJ/WvahUmPmaxrf/ioosLWUqoTAWGySL08isU2dRCR XPBKEXwEpp8EEPsI3Ro4m7OUMEnsevRZ4dMAzls5S8YBsngBkBLLawF8ZqHmvZAu3+zm +v3w== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.136.89 with SMTP id k86mr1283574iod.63.1429924452941; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 18:14:12 -0700 (PDT) Sender: justinbeech@gmail.com Received: by 10.50.107.42 with HTTP; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 18:14:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <58D8FA8C-F67C-4F8B-BBF0-4296885731D0@gmail.com> References: <87wq18jmak.fsf@toke.dk> <87oamkjfhf.fsf@toke.dk> <87k2x8jcnw.fsf@toke.dk> <58D8FA8C-F67C-4F8B-BBF0-4296885731D0@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2015 11:14:12 +1000 X-Google-Sender-Auth: lyzv1VIvZNU87T25-D2oT2RTObE Message-ID: From: jb To: Rich Brown , bloat Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1145a07212d9120514823b5a Subject: Re: [Bloat] DSLReports Speed Test has latency measurement built-in X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2015 01:14:42 -0000 --001a1145a07212d9120514823b5a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I better at least do the suggested color banding, and wait till network gets to quiescence between phases. Currently there is a 5 second delay between download and start of upload, however it is just automatic, it does not wait for the latency to drop back and everything to drain. However even if the upload starts off with issues from the download, it does not change the speed result. But since we don't want to see any download bloat being tagged as upload bloat, then it isn't ideal as it stands. I can also extend the upload phase as incoming bandwidth is free. Another enhancement coming will be the ability to select the congestion choice on the server side. This will be reserved just for advanced users but it would be neat to play with. On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 7:45 AM, Rich Brown wrote: > I just updated the Quick Test for Bufferbloat page to list DSLReports > first (and call it the "Easy Test for Bufferbloat"). See > http://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/cerowrt/wiki/Quick_Test_for_Bufferbloat > > The page still describes the ping & speed test procedure if people want to > use the old/harder test procedure. > > Rich > --001a1145a07212d9120514823b5a Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I better at least do the suggested color banding, and wait= till network gets to quiescence between phases.

Current= ly there is a 5 second delay between download and start of upload, however = it is just automatic, it does not wait for the latency to drop back and eve= rything to drain. However even if the upload starts off with issues from th= e download, it does not change the speed result.
But since we don= 't want to see any download bloat being tagged as upload bloat, then it= isn't ideal as it stands.

I can also extend t= he upload phase as incoming bandwidth is free.

Ano= ther enhancement coming will be the ability to select the congestion choice= on the server side. This will be reserved just for advanced users but it w= ould be neat to play with.

On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 7:45 AM, Rich Brown <r= ichb.hanover@gmail.com> wrote:
I just updated the Quick Test = for Bufferbloat page to list DSLReports first (and call it the "Easy T= est for Bufferbloat"). See=C2=A0http://= www.bufferbloat.net/projects/cerowrt/wiki/Quick_Test_for_Bufferbloat

The page still describes the ping & speed test p= rocedure if people want to use the old/harder test procedure.

Rich

--001a1145a07212d9120514823b5a--