From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ie0-x235.google.com (mail-ie0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B035A21F562 for ; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 06:53:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by iejt8 with SMTP id t8so100264422iej.2 for ; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 06:53:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=FIUelQnzj5DUou03DnmcAOKy3V+u8nj5UqdpzRvJbGQ=; b=Waip7ecf3B5loMHx/HuUjj4yolkPVxkUi+xl+ZICxOVpLD5I4unDNvFjcUYayw97HL ifBp2bD0sQ2n7fICX6J+QrK6Ci8ptNJJ1f5tZU+NcpUmMr0v/W8RN0eHtvSO1aRCTqo7 Uw9yAfOfDV6wzn7BuFmEIjVR0Vw9M5dz7diitilWwz+0NvomDObNc7jpN6pi03Gg1/YV LV6gu40e+t5/a0P/pqQmgIHb+jZt93JPHwVRAUjN4Rb43ZrvPVvE1xMo3DA928gPJN9B 7FmCsp/y/hhlM/rO4V5Q4YSTY3iwtqbeCAiCjABn1NVdBA23nQxGy+/QWjX/tpyfx33a anow== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.66.230 with SMTP id i6mr15344571igt.22.1429451611117; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 06:53:31 -0700 (PDT) Sender: justinbeech@gmail.com Received: by 10.50.107.42 with HTTP; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 06:53:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87wq18jmak.fsf@toke.dk> References: <87wq18jmak.fsf@toke.dk> Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2015 23:53:31 +1000 X-Google-Sender-Auth: fQtV7dEdXK8FkegJAJA52s-u6i8 Message-ID: From: jb To: =?UTF-8?B?VG9rZSBIw7hpbGFuZC1Kw7hyZ2Vuc2Vu?= , bloat Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bd6be22811f8f05141423b8 Subject: Re: [Bloat] DSLReports Speed Test has latency measurement built-in X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2015 13:54:02 -0000 --047d7bd6be22811f8f05141423b8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sorry its midnight here and I've got to that stage where my mistake ratio rises above 50%. In the log it says "0.81s Forcing lo-fi mode due to slow CPU" which actually meant no animated graphs because platform is _linux_ (forget Firefox), as often linux has a tenuous connection between gpu and browsers. And thus no latency measurements. But all is ok now, the current test does the latency thing irregardless. (Unless you click 3g or GPRS). On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 11:10 PM, Toke H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen wrote: > jb writes: > > > Oh my apologies, I see from your log you are using firefox+linux. > > Nope, chromium. The first of the two links is mine. The other one I > pasted from one of the previous mails on the list; and that *does* show > the under-load latency measurements. > > -Toke > --047d7bd6be22811f8f05141423b8 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sorry its midnight here and I've got to that stage whe= re my mistake ratio rises above 50%. In the log it says "0.81s Forcing= lo-fi mode due to slow CPU"
which actually meant no animated grap= hs because platform is _linux_
(forget Firefox), as often linux h= as a tenuous connection between gpu and browsers. And thus no latency measu= rements.

But all is ok now, the current test does = the latency thing irregardless.
(Unless you click 3g or GPRS).


On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 11:10 PM, Toke H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen <= span dir=3D"ltr"><toke= @toke.dk> wrote:
jb <justin@dslr.net> = writes:

> Oh my apologies, I see from your log you are using firefox+linux.

Nope, chromium. The first of the two links is mine. The other one I<= br> pasted from one of the previous mails on the list; and that *does* show
the under-load latency measurements.

-Toke

--047d7bd6be22811f8f05141423b8--