From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ig0-x233.google.com (mail-ig0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7363321F2F4 for ; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 13:25:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by igblo3 with SMTP id lo3so33252148igb.1 for ; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 13:25:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=7pgFZt30VJGx0EyklLuRELnhq2Atv8v4vcQ8smgzVYM=; b=kcFSr29olGufihyZASVKUL4wkpkN0xQWhWrJxnCq6ONXiL3creUzum7FUwc0iYjuZS +g24TmB+kDKyEcabFqmqoQBwml/mea76ByuDqIATqHylhbn9w288wVqX/hMYyKt9Ks06 xDKugJQd4g69Fbzl/4vQYi866HgY4Hnuvcvmtq7gjRnteYI5JvmevEAgJ6NeaVekHKjK o6swuc+ZgQnYNb2NvRODhi20pTh7W+fm/fG6BOqaqcWU38h6fEh7dmOAxayRRKttB386 S3EAOsai5fIdVqsjyinUhQUZCH11dzHF3QHw3uj2yf/zUkG1+2gySsRgjiETFH7pcLAl 8T5w== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.169.160 with SMTP id f32mr6307865ioj.83.1429820383282; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 13:19:43 -0700 (PDT) Sender: justinbeech@gmail.com Received: by 10.50.107.42 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 13:19:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <87wq18jmak.fsf@toke.dk> <87oamkjfhf.fsf@toke.dk> <87k2x8jcnw.fsf@toke.dk> Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 06:19:43 +1000 X-Google-Sender-Auth: xobcweGLfTNJwVeGGjjG__v81xg Message-ID: From: jb To: bloat Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1142646c09ee4505146a002c Subject: Re: [Bloat] DSLReports Speed Test has latency measurement built-in X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 20:26:26 -0000 --001a1142646c09ee4505146a002c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > It's actually remarkably un-bloated... I have seen a number of remarkably unbloated comcast tests including this one at gigabit symmetric: http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/348305 which I know is someone testing their future products. Unfortunately I have no visibility as to the hardware in use in each test, and should really ask when such a result floats past. Put up a big box begging them to fill out a little survey. On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 4:04 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote: > On Thu, 23 Apr 2015, Dave Taht wrote: > > justin: >> >> thx for nuking the log scale. that makes the bloat much more visible >> here (typical cablemodem) >> >> http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/322800 >> >> I am puzzled as to my post fq_codel result here at T+40 and will have >> to repeat... >> >> http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/322992 >> > > This is my DOCSIS3 250/50 connection: > > http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/349547 > > During the evenings (as it was when I tested now) I seem to not get over > 100-150 megabit/s downstream, indicating it's saturating on the coax > segment at peak usage. I should probably get a newer modem, mine is a few > years old. > > It's actually remarkably un-bloated... > > -- > Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se > > _______________________________________________ > Bloat mailing list > Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat > --001a1142646c09ee4505146a002c Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>=C2=A0It's actually= remarkably un-bloated...

I have seen a number of remarkably=C2=A0unbloated comcast te= sts=C2=A0
including this one at gigabit symmetric:

=

which I = know is someone testing their future products.

Unf= ortunately I have no visibility as to the hardware in use in each test,
and should really ask when such a result floats past. Put up a big b= ox
begging them to fill out a little survey.

=

On Fri, Apr= 24, 2015 at 4:04 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> w= rote:
On Thu, 23 Apr 201= 5, Dave Taht wrote:

justin:

thx for nuking the log scale. that makes the bloat much more visible
here (typical cablemodem)

ht= tp://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/322800

I am puzzled as to my post fq_codel result here at T+40 and will have
to repeat...

ht= tp://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/322992

 This is my DOCSIS3 250/50 connection:

ht= tp://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/349547

During the evenings (as it was when I tested now) I seem to not get over 10= 0-150 megabit/s downstream, indicating it's saturating on the coax segm= ent at peak usage. I should probably get a newer modem, mine is a few years= old.

It's actually remarkably un-bloated...

--
Mikael Abrahamsson=C2=A0 =C2=A0 email: swmike@swm.pp.se
<= div class=3D"h5">
_______________________________________________
Bloat mailing list
Bloat@list= s.bufferbloat.net
= https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat

--001a1142646c09ee4505146a002c--