From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wr1-x429.google.com (mail-wr1-x429.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::429]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B61323B29E for ; Thu, 3 Sep 2020 09:27:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x429.google.com with SMTP id m6so3275646wrn.0 for ; Thu, 03 Sep 2020 06:27:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ieee.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=vrb032HoIdrOajGHbnxlXbYGSkrMWzbtNAfD4R0b/qQ=; b=P+FMR0zqs9Y83zdF9WvL+I0JnBnac5EwRUiKip102ySzNjXiEtlLyhnMMs3QZgmQws h9qev7qjaFqpsbIVrWJ0fkAvPOb/3BLqwPcMWTXOjv0XxmYVdtHlVkIkL00OUPzVIF6y GtlPPsvDGX3h8rMXJci60RxZFIUeBLzTRf1/M= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=vrb032HoIdrOajGHbnxlXbYGSkrMWzbtNAfD4R0b/qQ=; b=kO9dEOkEs6bc0tqtwlpclQCEWtPHVSwGFMm93Sc3iztd5wDOYB1lM6H1Wqv58tBQvl fNZME1c8sNJ0M8ViJu6WHwFVcLvb7O9N5lN79IVzlrSIyrVSQ285OPIfHp2S9VRpJnRr i4LTKOa47IcUcRUxtHJ/o9DdplbUzDsliJM7K8IoskNRE/FtsZeYzUAaG/AHhzy7ROqr OHK4wdTF24GBKFYGdcdEcpDdPMIb2p7ADKOP8DB/+3brRrVQbJuuTiqhcmivaoOUbQ+J 8UkHM+BbFIs4AmW3u2JdBTZi+9hviuW43RmtPDnYErvCZ38XOuasjOnK1OcLyrkOsjBj 6Fog== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530CHalr0qikuTnxx5YupapCMTSAfg5Hs+gR23kWzCSWWPx7DqBW hABoMvCSAkewdfgB8fMejX1ejIxTycj/i2dSPvjoTg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwGn8AgBNmy5UVKdtXATG8cy7QaLWJv01VhYfhoMDhey0CZv/FKgMWCdqQFIX/RpXIssb0jH8muY3dM40/C/bs= X-Received: by 2002:adf:9d44:: with SMTP id o4mr2486156wre.361.1599139639841; Thu, 03 Sep 2020 06:27:19 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <87mu2bjbf8.fsf@toke.dk> <5DBFB383-13E8-4587-BE49-1767471D7D59@jonathanfoulkes.com> <87r1rliiiw.fsf@toke.dk> <07CD4278-D448-49D2-AC73-9C230EC041DE@jonathanfoulkes.com> <87imcxi4mq.fsf@toke.dk> In-Reply-To: From: Luca Muscariello Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2020 15:27:08 +0200 Message-ID: To: Mikael Abrahamsson Cc: =?UTF-8?B?VG9rZSBIw7hpbGFuZC1Kw7hyZ2Vuc2Vu?= , bloat Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Bloat] CAKE in openwrt high CPU X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2020 13:27:20 -0000 On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 3:19 PM Mikael Abrahamsson via Bloat wrote: > > On Tue, 1 Sep 2020, Toke H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen wrote: > > > Yup, the number of cores is only going to go up, so for CAKE to stay > > relevant it'll need to be able to take advantage of this eventually :) > > https://www.hardkernel.com/shop/odroid-h2plus/ is an interesting platform= , > it has a quad core machine with 2 x 2.5GbE NICs. > > When using something like this for routing with HTB+CAKE for bidirectiona= l > shaping below line rate, what would be the main things that would need to > be improved? IMO, hardware offloading for shaping, beyond this specific platform. I ignore if there is any roadmap with that objective. > > -- > Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se____________________________= ___________________ > Bloat mailing list > Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat