Re: [Bloat] Multiple WAN ports & SQM?

[Daniel Sterling <sterling.daniel@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3262 bytes --]

This is what came up with when I was running both DSL and cable modems.  I
don’t use it any more but it should still work

https://gist.githubusercontent.com/eqhmcow/9967292/raw/d091ed7430d3c161971cbf0d20c3267b77f0c5ce/multi-routes.sh

This script lets you use multiple internet connections, both
simultaneously and transparently, both from the router itself and via
boxes behind the router through NAT.


For this to actually work with NAT, you most definitely need to
recompile your linux kernel with the "Routing and
# Netfilter" patches from http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/#routes . (Using the
latest full patchset is fine.)



On Sun, May 3, 2020 at 8:26 PM David Lang <david@lang.hm> wrote:

> I've been wanting to set this sort of thing up (the best DSL I can get is
> 8/1,
> and that's with a bondd DSL setup) but have not been able to find a good
> tutorial in setting things up.
>
> anyone have any pointers?
>
> David Lang
>
>   On Sun, 3 May 2020, Dave Taht wrote:
>
> > Date: Sun, 3 May 2020 07:33:56 -0700
> > From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
> > To: Daniel Sterling <sterling.daniel@gmail.com>
> > Cc: Rich Brown <richb.hanover@gmail.com>, bloat <
> bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
> > Subject: Re: [Bloat] Multiple WAN ports & SQM?
> >
> > not huge on bonding, simpler to just get the two uplinks and split
> > flows across them with an sqm instance for each and a tc hash
> > directing flows at one or another.
> >
> > On Sun, May 3, 2020 at 7:30 AM Daniel Sterling
> > <sterling.daniel@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> When I had both DSL and cable modem, I compiled Linux with this patch
> set to make multi gateway NAT work and it worked great
> >>
> >> http://ja.ssi.bg/#routes
> >>
> >> Should be able to use that plus ifb+cake on each NIC to do the right
> thing, aye?
> >>
> >> As an aside, I'm kind of furious that NAT fix never got merged upstream
> :( it's so useful for multiple uplinks
> >>
> >> -- Dan
> >>
> >> On May 3, 2020, at 10:23 AM, Rich Brown <richb.hanover@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Given the crummy internet service in my area (DSL, max of
> 15mbps/1mbps), I wonder if we could improve things by getting a second
> connection from our ISP and "bonding" the two links together in my OpenWrt
> router.
> >>
> >> I see both Multiwan (which is self-described as old) and mwan3.
> >>
> >> But neither would seem to offer the kinds of latency control
> (SQM/fq_codel/cake) that the cool kids in networking have come to expect.
> >>
> >> Any recommendations from this group for such an effort? Thanks.
> >>
> >> Rich
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Bloat mailing list
> >> Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
> >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Bloat mailing list
> >> Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
> >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Make Music, Not War
> >
> > Dave Täht
> > CTO, TekLibre, LLC
> > http://www.teklibre.com
> > Tel: 1-831-435-0729
> > _______________________________________________
> > Bloat mailing list
> > Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
> > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 5538 bytes --]