From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-oi1-x244.google.com (mail-oi1-x244.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::244]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 094AA3B2A4 for ; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 10:11:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-oi1-x244.google.com with SMTP id l204so12349444oib.3 for ; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 07:11:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=uTNwjzo6A7u6JLjCfPbjJKKAvMNSzHQAupBJhofcxz4=; b=J1HulrlrZ+jOh/8xGte/NOVIGFRt3dI4yWQWK663kBOrcDtKecz4D0Ohug4ryL+EWg EB7hrINSFa56bLU5fzisQg5xPF9D13JYptIHtFUWUCecjPcdeQ00ULFb0fc8jcNrbIq9 s5YRU4NVSfHqaIdlDw06Yb6VMwJSLdDnalTbS2mn9YCCzQHJ3Sb41nRqW0I+7zkoZWKl JX2MfvKw22kvMpy88LjxnEZuBuU3jpbnCvnR90L7DG2jzTVLpWh0eWqHMJBq1vz7cVBd sh1YdtoVMOLtVxhO9FsODv1DwUkc/QqQMJ/itqtKS51r8jpkPVR1KjHhMzOivxKKKXHC 3pJQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=uTNwjzo6A7u6JLjCfPbjJKKAvMNSzHQAupBJhofcxz4=; b=c5bnX6Tp11K0ZtjCx9HsXBxGOfLVR4sS+LklEYo3gUHt8P7iybUfzPsjF80QzNOp9J /bJwQxffLx2w9jsWCIRGckBclaL1ajKWJ7C38IV/FePygvohGj5wf7tnLTz7V6uehxha K2KhBT82/L49da4mrv0VQZkqLrLJluFSvVTJJ8oZlTN9BrCR9hzhz/rBsM2k3PODPV1r etsFhwzjpgULfuxmTUVNOOIiKR0ewChcWwiWqRpNzQ1rxv7tsUvnEXmpSJZhzWMXFQtz KmlzkO1HxrvY6HUKmrnxf16u0voc3hNxYhytA3i4HLRTNmzmYhUNSZ+0NK3tRvbZclg9 KKwA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532Li/7m7/UEIIaqeTXBu3+09h+HGOgU6vewezBw8Uj/jwz33UFc X15JD0S0NuLZd7zhnDW2KrfS5aF42fAL8ooIM5X7CWGPVXI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz42jZKxuDiAr8+vT/NiURv7BwMwqKEZH9xKHn0czMyORutR98P/2uSDYgWsbXFqaPlhyF4s1syDMvaTY3Co+4= X-Received: by 2002:aca:bf54:: with SMTP id p81mr3429139oif.8.1597155105228; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 07:11:45 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <225a9c89-ac76-f21e-1450-5deeb3cd23eb@tomh.org> <04949cee-c4de-900c-e1b1-4b1f227933eb@rogers.com> In-Reply-To: From: Daniel Sterling Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2020 10:11:33 -0400 Message-ID: To: Kenneth Porter Cc: bloat Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [Bloat] How about a topical LWN article on demonstrating the real-world goodness of CAKE? X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2020 14:11:46 -0000 https://github.com/tohojo/sqm-scripts/blob/master/src/piece_of_cake.qos looks to be more or less what I'm doing On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 10:09 AM Daniel Sterling wrote: > > as far as I know it's much simpler; I literally just turn on cake per > NIC with the correct settings applied for my environment > > the env settings that matter are: which NIC is WAN vs LAN; and how > much bandwidth you want cake to enforce. > > Also I find I get best results with "besteffort" vs using any of > cake's internal additional queues. I don't have enough visibility into > how cake is working to know what exactly is happening, and it may be > I'm confounding cake with some other env issue, but I've stuck with > besteffort due to seeing more latency when I turn on multiple cake > queues > > On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 9:57 AM Kenneth Porter wrote: > > > > --On Tuesday, August 11, 2020 9:43 AM -0400 Daniel Sterling > > wrote: > > > > > as promised here is the script I run after rebooting my openwrt box, > > > to set up cake > > > > > > https://gist.github.com/eqhmcow/c378c46a41aa5716767a0da811087dd4 > > > > How does this differ from the sqm-scripts available in Fedora and OpenWrt? > > > > https://github.com/tohojo/sqm-scripts > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Bloat mailing list > > Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net > > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat