From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-oi1-x22c.google.com (mail-oi1-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3836B3B29E for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 11:50:10 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-oi1-x22c.google.com with SMTP id w124so202512oia.6 for ; Tue, 05 Jan 2021 08:50:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=SLOgyBtoX6Ai1ph4eLmrmfacav49xHii4FoWFctfW0w=; b=k5bx/UyjRtay8OAfe0hrF6LRRwVSqNzGBOHKASfJ4Q16CM80XiswfHHAAflaBJlPVS a0Pw58uXGYXSL9u/RJI2j/OhgbL3oREkVzmLWxCS4MGZaa4UNskR3q5R+iH68KGxo2/6 81rnorzXsEbxgzgTWjG+gR6roi3lfHfzOeRClJ3I6iDS07vkkRtrMTSJw7P7wgHvUAEE A+6R+qfTpX1nI5ygCUvsHFKOgOQf6VXFpWUTgbRQhdPkQ0Z1BDdDIC9ztS/jUwXrO5FZ O02bmwAx/IIlwuj3Vu9RYDf5XN3bgclQ040MokaRr/Jqt2lhs0xjB1tpsXtTVkpw0+N7 6niQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=SLOgyBtoX6Ai1ph4eLmrmfacav49xHii4FoWFctfW0w=; b=bP7EffVvovR00sNzOrH7uzPzlSB3kOpzHpwq2RQQV50zHytZVJBMKfy6q7iiJCrFwb SvWum/F5mP5cSi+NKXNa2EntYb/GR4z7m4gbcOAP/4VsT6SIferhfA/9FRcBWIm7K2H1 Dkg+X3gpG11p2pUuMSEQntMmPSwMEn8MHZuyRhBaKrJEERD9hUevd5stX0jpsOUzdlLh GScEWghmYkTsSEjRjydj0CxeViuZeOaex6GaHO/xhSfVDEVLus8LJdtQ7I/Z7VmadjbE abKgzmqXE0iITA55mvMCRf9219YI/mv2ZTw9t2tedLNEUyz1nt9B7vcDPI8ax88MxWmh nFWA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530jXAEdptQUamK2fNtXn3w6+wpQJCUQyjEX8MoCghK4tEnoektf x2/gYLyZQDiRN8a9p9K2T4SL0rjfrtiwXRfvZUc49XC1ufY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx+9brX7dQmoQdz1HlvpQ3CCEuq1qH/znnRSDyoaJdFRrrVoLAs1/sUfbdXNIfAgQQO/AstvLhsU4E+e470vDk= X-Received: by 2002:aca:1b04:: with SMTP id b4mr306327oib.3.1609865409288; Tue, 05 Jan 2021 08:50:09 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210104205501.52a0ed46@hermes.local> <29119.1609863018@localhost> In-Reply-To: <29119.1609863018@localhost> From: Daniel Sterling Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2021 11:49:58 -0500 Message-ID: To: Michael Richardson Cc: Stephen Hemminger , bloat Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [Bloat] Openwrt stability? X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2021 16:50:10 -0000 On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 11:10 AM Michael Richardson wrote: > > Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > Any idea how to debug this? Is there a way to get serial console? > > It depends upon your device, but in most cases, open the case, find the pins, > attach USB/TTL interface. Some newish devices (Turris MOX, for instance), > annoyingly need 1.8V TTL interfaces, which are harder to find and more > expensive. ($20 vs $3) Best option may be to just buy better supported hardware :) I've been running openwrt on a small mobile-class PC (sandy bridge celeron) and then just using stock UBNT SOHO (amplifi HD) access points for the wifi itself. This is working rather well. The amplifi units have buffers that are too big but that's mitigated on the openwrt side with cake