From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-oi1-x242.google.com (mail-oi1-x242.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::242]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD7103B2A4 for ; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 10:09:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-oi1-x242.google.com with SMTP id v13so12280573oiv.13 for ; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 07:09:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=vDPivUqKQDz2Na42uSA4FPK6z6sXZmZVqxF3WLCayAc=; b=DF+c4bIoDGiKBuWsZPFTYpXgNR0jBXIStlUQ9ajB0R3x92ilmka5uiO+c+ddsjRkkY /DDqbtCjq7whRwVjX5lowA4F15aLH73bW6FlwBrdIM5k0BKu7ZnmUmyh8PKEWVu79Mpm 11wSx3MAV5HnxatPhH8D6kkvKiGaX3Oh0nQDo03kkXHF1XoB8hsWltx2llXE13bwPQf1 Frk2R0efhUGkStHaLarDXhCVUoWkoR0OGC1AHajxYQCz/fVaaxRiLfSjjd+v7yqPzIPv uhfql4CWbm6aatd2lOE4K+2mpbY3pJcMnPoXXBTs2VxQRi+Myv1Tb2wivIid0+B2LfSN 6XHw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=vDPivUqKQDz2Na42uSA4FPK6z6sXZmZVqxF3WLCayAc=; b=p/G3nSqcmpp0GvUYkeTlyDmcmCHQ1Gmw+QmVvTW6uiAuV8nquLLW2BujqHwzuv/1mH s6ctl7eXgLfRuLZknkJC6yo5ITN5BepCDt0pMQDvEudrjSbn+7yT69lSdsOTgEf14/16 S9VtMlyLFW0eB6hqwsAXzVmBDOzmuNE7qUmpZHrVWssy9OwpmVJL5uCUfJZqAGNj6hLj 0nzbDC2lFjr8JQQhaIVgyBTPdp7pVIwvAX1zbyS1etLWt8RM/8O+HRLph/BrUnz8LhQC Y2MVxZj8NcXP2/Hd7TielmStjo6lAJsJNR6spYqT260IdqT2ou3KdXf5BxSIZ/dpmiGd Co/w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531QsCceY/NOHegMb1c+nATEWnWJiOt6FLobbDPa66ISx/5rpOkx OcpTkRB9yNpy/kqKVqQdPLT2YcD+3kuPbcqWt46RoCee X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxEf9EluD/jjvpTexsHpRVB/xPvZYRRdCmqneq8K1eOgB4FgWcCaqq+1uMbbVUp7NN5giYkwy8VQi2f8v9ElS8= X-Received: by 2002:aca:bf54:: with SMTP id p81mr3419556oif.8.1597154986937; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 07:09:46 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <225a9c89-ac76-f21e-1450-5deeb3cd23eb@tomh.org> <04949cee-c4de-900c-e1b1-4b1f227933eb@rogers.com> In-Reply-To: From: Daniel Sterling Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2020 10:09:35 -0400 Message-ID: To: Kenneth Porter Cc: bloat Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [Bloat] How about a topical LWN article on demonstrating the real-world goodness of CAKE? X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2020 14:09:47 -0000 as far as I know it's much simpler; I literally just turn on cake per NIC with the correct settings applied for my environment the env settings that matter are: which NIC is WAN vs LAN; and how much bandwidth you want cake to enforce. Also I find I get best results with "besteffort" vs using any of cake's internal additional queues. I don't have enough visibility into how cake is working to know what exactly is happening, and it may be I'm confounding cake with some other env issue, but I've stuck with besteffort due to seeing more latency when I turn on multiple cake queues On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 9:57 AM Kenneth Porter wrote: > > --On Tuesday, August 11, 2020 9:43 AM -0400 Daniel Sterling > wrote: > > > as promised here is the script I run after rebooting my openwrt box, > > to set up cake > > > > https://gist.github.com/eqhmcow/c378c46a41aa5716767a0da811087dd4 > > How does this differ from the sqm-scripts available in Fedora and OpenWrt? > > https://github.com/tohojo/sqm-scripts > > > _______________________________________________ > Bloat mailing list > Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat