From: Benjamin Cronce <bcronce@gmail.com>
To: bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Bloat] Upgrading to 250Mb internet - dslreport results
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2018 09:41:49 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJ_ENFFRb-bqisH4K-AZLgFAqPCG1irhxmKQLAYsF6-JUDaU5Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJ_ENFGy2jhiwkH7cnZeLpTRPjgjAknhr=La4ehoNBa7DXtfTg@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1588 bytes --]
250/250 results
250/250 unshaped http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/36310277
250/250 shaped to 240/240 http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/36310700
250/250 shaped to 300/300 http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/36310832
I think I'll shape to 300/300 for now. This limits how high the initial
download burst can get while allowing the ISP to do the bulk of the AQM.
On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 7:33 AM Benjamin Cronce <bcronce@gmail.com> wrote:
> The contract on my $39.95 150/150 internet has ended and and wife decided
> we're going to the $70 250/250 contractless package. Yay, no more contracts
> for anything for anyone.
>
> The switch over is supposed to happen today, so I decide to do some
> dslreport speedtests
>
> 150/150 shaped to 145/145 http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/36261220
> 150/150 shaped to 240/240 http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/36261354
> 150/150 no shaping http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/36261439
>
> After that second test, I realized it hadn't happened yet. I did notice
> that I'm almost better off with no shaping on my end. The no shaping test
> does show my download shooting way up only to fall down shortly after and
> level off.
>
> These results are better than the last time I tested several years back.
> I'm tempted to shape slightly above my provisioned rate and let my ISP
> handle the AQM, but I have a bit more testing to do. I may attempt some
> alternative shapers+AQM with pfSense. FairQ+Codel I hear works well. Once
> 2.4.4 is release, using fq_Codel will be nice to try.
>
> I hope to show the 25/0250 results later today.
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2453 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-24 14:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-23 12:33 Benjamin Cronce
2018-07-24 14:41 ` Benjamin Cronce [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAJ_ENFFRb-bqisH4K-AZLgFAqPCG1irhxmKQLAYsF6-JUDaU5Q@mail.gmail.com \
--to=bcronce@gmail.com \
--cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox