From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-lf1-x132.google.com (mail-lf1-x132.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92FDC3B29E for ; Tue, 24 Jul 2018 10:42:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-lf1-x132.google.com with SMTP id v22-v6so3150366lfe.8 for ; Tue, 24 Jul 2018 07:42:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=EwDPs2tKmEzJX7yPN+FR+ThR+iAGwGXCnarnlg45Iio=; b=ZJXDwSNHh8Yii9YnMzkfu+HsOHAC1F/JrpZzizqVjP2RdViyQ8yCC8ZpPI2trid9vz RSLcYdw23Xrl5jWlHY7JnzbjZYRkABxUgbqLCv8fZtXf2gz2qFg6IA3BgQ4FRrFM3JwD gptZ12cC5+EA2fUdOodmlwu7JDI0gJj/yZ0E8ck34DmikRPpZ3k3hThGZ8Wy35B8Klb8 VqZzwksJi++ZrVcxhnGOdLTpQwy2uBA/+yR1Ezrj99glZKzJJEoYFJD46b2DyheAKbgm /q1IAaYL3cv2W0aj6Wa2BIBOMo2LUygh3BESLss9BF7/D39Wz4C6lDBwGtg/Q/GHmRap hhtw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=EwDPs2tKmEzJX7yPN+FR+ThR+iAGwGXCnarnlg45Iio=; b=VGctlNVoioyJEd01qUlgXQxhLhBEVFXOeTo1nvX/D1PTo4CwXbpoqde3NlwNNvTAPz cx0++3Aihq118ujbIqjZTFolItf0DEqDsENKcD0ftRx0LMdiFKKh6hjzEdNPjgtE/t9u jDyX2/j9TgEo5OQ9vCz9KlCORJTZcV/ctWzdlwSj9IIhctgzSpqW1x3qc7FYqilyjQmn JKCoxiX1h37TtSwc/fdT/1xA2CKs9kUQ6e6OQojxGXvasbWFSKDiAnRAbLhGz9N78I7F KYwZjo7T+wAWoT0YWwAalK+hYc/AlQVg43FBzC2QCVvHYmwe8rdq1N1hOcZjj41m1omp twnw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlHlh6Ebs3CbmHozI0Kc+whugkFliwbsRMwLHKVq2nljagWPd0aw cP/7ImoovD+iisC+cAa0jftW8jAzCisbfCj3G8Pidznp X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpcFcjT4qlZ6+wQmLS1lhwOb9GCpqlCKxHZAWN93i+fzJXGtC1+MKujqlTOGKNHykY8ZPdPsqRpn+B9SwzAVZ3Q= X-Received: by 2002:a19:c403:: with SMTP id u3-v6mr10042008lff.87.1532443323220; Tue, 24 Jul 2018 07:42:03 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Benjamin Cronce Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2018 09:41:49 -0500 Message-ID: To: bloat Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000eb4ff80571bfc344" Subject: Re: [Bloat] Upgrading to 250Mb internet - dslreport results X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2018 14:42:04 -0000 --000000000000eb4ff80571bfc344 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" 250/250 results 250/250 unshaped http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/36310277 250/250 shaped to 240/240 http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/36310700 250/250 shaped to 300/300 http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/36310832 I think I'll shape to 300/300 for now. This limits how high the initial download burst can get while allowing the ISP to do the bulk of the AQM. On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 7:33 AM Benjamin Cronce wrote: > The contract on my $39.95 150/150 internet has ended and and wife decided > we're going to the $70 250/250 contractless package. Yay, no more contracts > for anything for anyone. > > The switch over is supposed to happen today, so I decide to do some > dslreport speedtests > > 150/150 shaped to 145/145 http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/36261220 > 150/150 shaped to 240/240 http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/36261354 > 150/150 no shaping http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/36261439 > > After that second test, I realized it hadn't happened yet. I did notice > that I'm almost better off with no shaping on my end. The no shaping test > does show my download shooting way up only to fall down shortly after and > level off. > > These results are better than the last time I tested several years back. > I'm tempted to shape slightly above my provisioned rate and let my ISP > handle the AQM, but I have a bit more testing to do. I may attempt some > alternative shapers+AQM with pfSense. FairQ+Codel I hear works well. Once > 2.4.4 is release, using fq_Codel will be nice to try. > > I hope to show the 25/0250 results later today. > --000000000000eb4ff80571bfc344 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
250/250 results

=C2=A0250/250 unshaped <= a href=3D"http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/36310277">http://www.dslrepor= ts.com/speedtest/36310277
=C2=A0250/250 shaped to 240/240 http://www.dslreports= .com/speedtest/36310700
=C2=A0250/250 shaped to 300/300 http://www.dslreports.c= om/speedtest/36310832

I think I= 9;ll shape to 300/300 for now. This limits how high the initial download bu= rst can get while allowing the ISP to do the bulk of the AQM.
On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 7:33 = AM Benjamin Cronce <bcronce@gmail.c= om> wrote:
= The contract on my $39.95 150/150 internet has ended and and wife decided w= e're going to the $70 250/250 contractless package. Yay, no more contra= cts for anything for anyone.

The switch over is supposed= to happen today, so I decide to do some dslreport speedtests
150/150 shaped to 145/145=C2=A0http://www.dslreports.com/speedt= est/36261220
150/150 shaped to 240/240=C2=A0http://www.dslrep= orts.com/speedtest/36261354

After th= at second test, I realized it hadn't happened yet. I did notice that I&= #39;m almost better off with no shaping on my end. The no shaping test does= show my download shooting way up only to fall down shortly after and level= off.

These results are better than the last time = I tested several years back. I'm tempted to shape slightly above my pro= visioned rate and let my ISP handle the AQM, but I have a bit more testing = to do. I may attempt some alternative shapers+AQM with pfSense. FairQ+Codel= I hear works well. Once 2.4.4 is release, using fq_Codel will be nice to t= ry.

I hope to show the 25/0250 results later today= .
--000000000000eb4ff80571bfc344--