This is my first time using a mailing list, so I apologize if I break any etiquettes.

Here is my situation. 

I have 100/100 via GPON, the ISP claims "dedicated" bandwidth defined as the port is not oversubscribed.

I was told their core network can handle all customers at 100% of their provisioned speeds, but their

trunk would go down in a spectacular blaze. I was also told their trunk consists of 6 links to Level 3

and they could handle 5 of those links going down without congestion occurring on the trunk during peak hours.

The GPON head unit aggregates directly into the core router, router is some flashy new Cisco 

that supports "a lot of 10Gb and 100Gb ports". I have a 1ms hop to my ISP, then a 9ms hop to Level 3.

The reason I mentioned this is it may be useful when interpreting these results that the only likely point

of congestion is my 100Mb connection.

DSLReports Jitter test https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/HxTrRZob4RNU9OdmdRoxS5Ig0xf-9qwZhFwh67uyVPg=w389-h540-no

On to bufferbloat.

Bypass firewall(PFSense) - no AQM/QoS on my part

32/16

24/12

Single Stream restriction

Through the firewall. No other traffic, so HFSC does not matter

80/443/8080 go into the same queue and uses just regular CoDel.

DSLReports uses a "web ping", so the ping goes through the same queue as the speedtest

Under load while doing P2P(About 80Mb down and 20Mb up just as I started the test)

HFSC: P2P in 20% queue and 80/443/8080 in 40% queue with ACKs going to a 20% realtime queue

Here you can see my quality graph spiked during the tests when I was outside the firewall. 

Because I bypassed the firewall and was no longer being traffic shaped, I was able to overload the connection.

To me it seems like bufferbloat is mostly handled. I did send them some emails to see if I could get a response

on what they use, but no luck.