From: Benjamin Cronce <bcronce@gmail.com>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Cc: "aqm@ietf.org" <aqm@ietf.org>, bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Bloat] tackling torrent on a 10mbit uplink (100mbit down)
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 17:14:54 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJ_ENFHMnu-d-fbqBDUNwFfn+0xLhLP=-ZaSk+n0NqnD9+-3Xw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw6Yw9WDA7M_g7bEMft7xxtvXN8X_XOWmPGJi7YM4sD5uA@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1291 bytes --]
>
>
> 7) transmission ate a metric ton of cpu (30% on a i3) at these speeds.
>
> 8) My (cable) link actually is 140mbit down, 11 up. I did not much
> care for asymmetric networks when the ratios were 6x1, so 13x1 is way
> up there....
>
> Anyway, 20% packet loss of the "right" packets was survivable. I will
> subject myself to the same test on other fq or aqms. And, if I can
> force myself to, with no aqm or fq. For SCIENCE!
>
> Attention, DMCA lawyers: Please send takedown notices to
> bufferbloat-research@/dev/null.org . One of the things truly
> astonishing about this is that in 12 hours in one night I downloaded
> more stuff than I could ever watch (mp4) or listen to (even in flac
> format) in several days of dedicated consumption. And it all just got
> rm -rf'd. It occurs to me there is a human upper bound to how much
> data one would ever want to consume, and we cracked that limit at
> 20mbit, with only 4k+ video driving demand any harder. When we started
> bufferbloat.net 20mbit downlinks were the best you could easily get.
Linux ISOs are a great way to saturate your download. I have enough
downloaded that while seeding, I can sustain over 10Mb/s, but don't expect
to saturate your upload since they're already heavily seeded, but less so
since I stopped recently.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2386 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-19 22:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-19 16:01 Dave Taht
2015-06-19 22:14 ` Benjamin Cronce [this message]
2015-06-20 1:08 ` Dave Taht
2015-06-20 0:47 ` Dave Taht
2015-06-21 15:39 ` Juliusz Chroboczek
2015-06-21 16:24 ` Benjamin Cronce
2015-06-21 15:32 ` [Bloat] BitTorrent and IPv6 [was: tackling torrent...] Juliusz Chroboczek
2015-06-22 19:29 ` Dave Taht
2015-06-22 21:08 ` Juliusz Chroboczek
2015-06-24 17:30 ` Juliusz Chroboczek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAJ_ENFHMnu-d-fbqBDUNwFfn+0xLhLP=-ZaSk+n0NqnD9+-3Xw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=bcronce@gmail.com \
--cc=aqm@ietf.org \
--cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox