From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qt0-x232.google.com (mail-qt0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 677283B29E for ; Thu, 2 Nov 2017 03:11:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-qt0-x232.google.com with SMTP id d9so5403738qtd.7 for ; Thu, 02 Nov 2017 00:11:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=2oWR5kwvglcrHBj2w10UytJeu+hkkIS+QjyesbTsMBg=; b=uujGlyvhoN+ylEBze7wxhQPDpWSAViuearKWu08cD89rkZKonAn8QpC7w8TU/pKJeQ rJfg/rAWiCWuJXCw5aaVcs4JHoYubADWbeYb+f1bglcsez4t0ANmXWPDwx5EmR/EYr/B ueobBGR1JYSuJAULP22VoirshZZyv8ctc+z/Vk8jp6k/HV76vY54pcgJATrXonY+5jk7 kfLLBuRkp0gCZKDzJsI/mspU5JGGQ8zGuXR09t5U31fQuRqR60D/lrj+hTwnu75AqRyH nzrejvVcxlsRWs9tSccPQVT7rFAPzz4Y5ivrLkrIC1g0sfsUy2q6LZXMkDbj2ZDiVz6e HUOw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=2oWR5kwvglcrHBj2w10UytJeu+hkkIS+QjyesbTsMBg=; b=FdfVnvOHdMsAtK/HXI4eEfxzjcudlwwItz2WjpRY8nNNM7o2vomgJ/9mFanFXFhE2L +jf1evMLYKTyfTdSzytNY6vxdBCF9QciOcEi9IALB3I7QN5KE85z9zUbeLEpQ1OeZxd9 Tzr94SVRB+BZDfOjElTBhA+ZC/TRpDJN825MTuwwa+xcOVqirzvgfiS14Theofsvcedl FE9MD2d5QclfNCtB1sYMmi6IAYYejd360OMQ+FNu/8USQMXo0nZ75Xp1Pkabvzgcd0Yq RqO7WkSjSo0YCLXK5xtBSNSHEI2+bROQCetHXeR1evMByB5F6zTxTzhIWXsvPPssDC+F TZkw== X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaVw65AJdBP+zuxD7CwjG/9zQaX1SnaH1oAlyZLE/uTb4csC7jyS 1uyw1NY1idB4M79k27PBmx1WJ9e0W4uyCUxaSYM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+TRyot78ZC2BF1fQgymqA/UGh2AnOX66u6sZbZexn0fvaleymZqBo9v9q1WbruW0gbV8VNvoVXLrmBpcsXdxCg= X-Received: by 10.200.36.253 with SMTP id t58mr3877846qtt.105.1509606706829; Thu, 02 Nov 2017 00:11:46 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.80.133 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Nov 2017 00:11:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.80.133 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Nov 2017 00:11:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Jonathan Morton Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2017 09:11:46 +0200 Message-ID: To: cloneman Cc: bloat Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113fdc5482df5d055cfab387" Subject: Re: [Bloat] Tuning fq_codel: are there more best practices for slow connections? (<1mbit) X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2017 07:11:47 -0000 --001a113fdc5482df5d055cfab387 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Have you tried Cake? It has automatic tuning of interval/target, based on the bandwidth setting of its internal shaper. Also lots of other goodies. - Jonathan Morton --001a113fdc5482df5d055cfab387 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Have you tried Cake?=C2=A0 It has automatic tuning of interv= al/target, based on the bandwidth setting of its internal shaper.=C2=A0 Als= o lots of other goodies.

- Jonathan Morton

--001a113fdc5482df5d055cfab387--