From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <chromatix99@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-vn0-x22b.google.com (mail-vn0-x22b.google.com
	[IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c0f::22b])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
	Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK))
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B8D521F1FB
	for <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 15:58:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by vnbg190 with SMTP id g190so14070172vnb.12
	for <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 15:58:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:cc:content-type;
	bh=VKGmG8aFdlzGLRnRG6QNIF8FDDD1NSL6+l2VWZTRf5A=;
	b=bdQCY+8lDOfTj68qRlsCBZuQMf1MRH1NFe6EuChEFjQSeEwZiAq5lV9+x9shDd4SyZ
	qrKcdp78GHJhaoJPD9tLL/VRPQfNXJxppyHeuQIiqiMxpn+9IkskF0zb3flva8fOdLAL
	p87Qg61sRtz9KB2wjtpy/wtv8Na+v7M9fLsPnwPosK0hnGG1XJD0VDuBX3y4yEnkCCou
	SxY0SmKz3LC9nhYWTMLkzqWF0i6t5RANugY3iugNgWplnV/sBopGJNL6tI2Bqi4bssa4
	X3jENJRMKB4NIa+OEZpJ7XH5H+q3fOyXUlj6yhb03+XPuDStZYxUihbYOiFeVhJaO+4l
	TgiA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.52.137.112 with SMTP id qh16mr1088539vdb.44.1430175512101;
	Mon, 27 Apr 2015 15:58:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.52.12.167 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 15:58:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.52.12.167 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 15:58:31 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw6-vRfGPHMMs17bXbYaqL1+5oA0fp5L=w9Pf5UsynHLRQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAA93jw6-vRfGPHMMs17bXbYaqL1+5oA0fp5L=w9Pf5UsynHLRQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 01:58:31 +0300
Message-ID: <CAJq5cE18t8oaqV8XDi9EayoR5w=pRJ2f7Wbg8jw_ikLvftLSrw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec52d599f5d86f70514bcafc0
Cc: bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Bloat] some 110Mbit cable testing of the new dslreports stuff
X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat <bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/bloat>,
	<mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat>
List-Post: <mailto:bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat>,
	<mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 22:59:01 -0000

--bcaec52d599f5d86f70514bcafc0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Well, shaping downstream of the true bottleneck is somewhat less effective
than shaping upstream of it. Transiently, some of the queue is in the link
FIFO rather than in the managed queue.

- Jonathan Morton

--bcaec52d599f5d86f70514bcafc0
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8

<p dir="ltr">Well, shaping downstream of the true bottleneck is somewhat less effective than shaping upstream of it. Transiently, some of the queue is in the link FIFO rather than in the managed queue.</p>
<p dir="ltr"> - Jonathan Morton<br>
</p>

--bcaec52d599f5d86f70514bcafc0--