From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <chromatix99@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-qk0-x22f.google.com (mail-qk0-x22f.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22f])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14B9F3BA8E
 for <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 11:13:49 -0500 (EST)
Received: by mail-qk0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id b123so5034473qkg.7
 for <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 08:13:49 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
 :cc; bh=L9YG6NXGSxDMo7XXKOoRRCc5emdLWMRF2bFx+Ym2I8Q=;
 b=JZEaOpPE49oYgzbkrVfbcjuySUMf/2DJphulj3chk2L5ZH+c3jztgPNRulXrmJbwOW
 Sy7I01L9aYykRDB5IUhODrmdYlKAWep2y8YsTKZ1WV9SVFxzLnoNo3oKnHLzvGORXKE9
 CGTAgGFmvKj8SGsxLbpgMPq0Q4OgADh+C+d91QTEEq6bh3oaM2sUbr9C8FF4H627oe4k
 dyFNvHKLlYG3AfOXNQjsowQYw114DGfFBZQjPYFIciU8iPwxjjFUoUmMuW59LO145scP
 DZxnRxWJMYlkyzntoaEIFuSRAEoZyKUOmNX+1E43M4ng1h4PEQpxEJU/47jzpaAJ62Ud
 nQrg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to:cc;
 bh=L9YG6NXGSxDMo7XXKOoRRCc5emdLWMRF2bFx+Ym2I8Q=;
 b=WqajUXlMRu4ZTr2rKJhBdh2ubAs1cksABStE+4ETuMP9DHImjEDB9cKnGezJDeXnhY
 0IvOTBGYSWrgVk2Wr2LjYfUolf6j0XYAs2NHUl1z7I3kgD4bEfIBSquwCdTACkSNijaK
 moum9O7zWq/YCniu0c86uOoZhUr70+sEbQ5Cm160MXN/twQATruVseKI+8HlNGTB4v+V
 cjwWbEjYPU+afZwyJ75dQbirfXaQTn8cRT+LajtGsxme/zgMmt2bfgGUG8BQCpcAWFxv
 gQaH40Zhg1HqaEF8n2wCGUmnPm4IGhxnLHwlJYCJkAyZ8Vp+iYE33tcSyDzAss8v3d36
 TSiA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX4bky1GSAiszhLZYwao12UmHJ737KvG8KdI57Ym60olublvk40H
 My1kAFlfjFP6YcSS6YVfxQmy44867U8z7Hg6rwI=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMaYkQvBWmVr/o60jzujuXX+TcKBv0vv9D/1ElFqX204+jgVB2sOQr3uQ7aKGHcBCpEoO63tl9dJeR/17ueOjOE=
X-Received: by 10.55.91.133 with SMTP id p127mr4851067qkb.135.1511972028677;
 Wed, 29 Nov 2017 08:13:48 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.140.102.179 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 08:13:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.140.102.179 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 08:13:47 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAJq5cE3qsmy8EFYZmQsLL_frm8Tty9Gkm92MQPZ649+kpM1oMw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAA93jw47ZAXAJmiOVCb2NR3JRcCfmX0TLr+55O0G+J6HCW5bVQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.DEB.2.20.1711290655590.32099@uplift.swm.pp.se>
 <4D0E907C-E15D-437C-B6F7-FF348346D615@gmx.de>
 <alpine.DEB.2.20.1711291347050.32099@uplift.swm.pp.se>
 <CAHx=1M7=ig-S-iQ_Fj2f-KMoa-QUVu1DZ4HyfWybvQiGeBb1GQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.DEB.2.20.1711291528260.32099@uplift.swm.pp.se>
 <CAHx=1M77XYX9t6J_zG1oArOze1-nTRPB9bNQLRfwFRZjH3mQjQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJq5cE3qsmy8EFYZmQsLL_frm8Tty9Gkm92MQPZ649+kpM1oMw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 18:13:47 +0200
Message-ID: <CAJq5cE2AeUdenY0ZERPjhrRXutgAyNMpYdqrx7g9OaBDan3wKw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Luca Muscariello <luca.muscariello@gmail.com>
Cc: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>, bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114ea376ae15bc055f216b2c"
Subject: Re: [Bloat] benefits of ack filtering
X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat <bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/bloat>,
 <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat>
List-Post: <mailto:bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat>,
 <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 16:13:49 -0000

--001a114ea376ae15bc055f216b2c
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Given an RTT estimate and knowledge of the congestion window, the AckCC
option could be used to target a handful of acks (maybe 4 to 10) per RTT.
As usual, extra acks would be sent when loss is suspected, on ECN events,
and when the push flag is set.

That would be perfectly sufficient.

- Jonathan Morton

--001a114ea376ae15bc055f216b2c
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<p dir=3D"ltr">Given an RTT estimate and knowledge of the congestion window=
, the AckCC option could be used to target a handful of acks (maybe 4 to 10=
) per RTT.=C2=A0 As usual, extra acks would be sent when loss is suspected,=
 on ECN events, and when the push flag is set.</p>
<p dir=3D"ltr">That would be perfectly sufficient.</p>
<p dir=3D"ltr"> - Jonathan Morton<br>
</p>

--001a114ea376ae15bc055f216b2c--