From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-gy0-f171.google.com (mail-gy0-f171.google.com [209.85.160.171]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D63F8201B3B for ; Fri, 4 Nov 2011 15:58:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by gyg8 with SMTP id 8so4111685gyg.16 for ; Fri, 04 Nov 2011 15:58:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Cb381lWGuIO//ZEiBsoQSTwjF/PPOmW1K6Zq6/sgE14=; b=CSuz8DtNIvZW4f3KywE9pFKSk5b4JIhqcD0nrkEszwn6mjsnqhgcQ7ur8yVjCeYfk+ YWYOGTNKPiKTAddma9Ut9LNIB7KV8HuMEOmK+9F9r8Gjlg2y/ePEx/4rjHuNzlPAtQ9T pqT8dBSA6dZuaAf0FdHtIvNQTO3nmWuOh8Rqs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.151.4 with SMTP id c4mr18887367icw.39.1320447487350; Fri, 04 Nov 2011 15:58:07 -0700 (PDT) Sender: jjreisert@gmail.com Received: by 10.42.169.69 with HTTP; Fri, 4 Nov 2011 15:58:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1320445509.9806.7.camel@robert-N150P> References: <1320445509.9806.7.camel@robert-N150P> Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2011 16:58:07 -0600 X-Google-Sender-Auth: zN4RdumOpjsfag2-PnhtVI1_QlE Message-ID: From: Jim Reisert AD1C To: Robert Bradley Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Bloat] Windows file sharing broken with RC6 ? X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2011 22:58:09 -0000 On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Robert Bradley wrote: > I may be wrong, but this could be down to Windows Firewall and its > default settings. =A0These restrict file-sharing to the local subnet. > Unlike most routers, CeroWRT separates wireless and wired connections > into separate subnets to prevent broadcasts from wired systems flooding > the wireless side. =A0Are the two computers connected to the router in th= e > same way? In each pair I described, one is wired and the other is wireless. I'll have to look into this, thanks! --=20 Jim Reisert AD1C, , http://www.ad1c.us