From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-iy0-f171.google.com (mail-iy0-f171.google.com [209.85.210.171]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2F2D20035E for ; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 16:30:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by iaeh11 with SMTP id h11so14053481iae.16 for ; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 16:30:20 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjreisert@gmail.com designates 10.50.161.170 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.50.161.170; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjreisert@gmail.com designates 10.50.161.170 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjreisert@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=jjreisert@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.50.161.170]) by 10.50.161.170 with SMTP id xt10mr1867725igb.8.1329784220915 (num_hops = 1); Mon, 20 Feb 2012 16:30:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Ln9gBqyy6mnZx4oXtORCU8DLsBNUQUtCqJk2p5iAB8s=; b=nX9EKtsnSfa6d5sKsLfLRDXzJWuOHQJxG8RBuVF095X531Fyius36a1AeGoatswUC9 uvXHQk8EULYEVwVSDXKRfowhLD7GqYqjF8bn1zcsYS25NFTwnjmsMXWrNoxk8I1RQt4m 6Nw2OUBVPmlNvKe11SK/e+oIXhbvl8zlu/Yuw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.161.170 with SMTP id xt10mr1496439igb.8.1329784220876; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 16:30:20 -0800 (PST) Sender: jjreisert@gmail.com Received: by 10.42.97.193 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 16:30:20 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4F426146.3010200@rogers.com> References: <4F426146.3010200@rogers.com> Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 17:30:20 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 0IYiCx0Wp_wOJSspOmCLJW5opmo Message-ID: From: Jim Reisert AD1C To: davecb@spamcop.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Bloat] How soon can the brave but foolish start being early adopters X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 00:30:22 -0000 On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 8:05 AM, David Collier-Brown wrote: > =A0I'm an interested lurker (and capacity planner) =A0who might easily tr= y > out the work that's been done in CeroWrt if it would be useful to you. > Consider me a prospective exposure tester (:-)) Dave, I went through this exercise some months back. The problem we ran into was that the wired and wireless subnets broke Windows file sharing. We got most of the way there, but due to family harmony, I had to abandon the testing I was doing before I could test a full solution. Search for my posts in the archives and you'll see where the problem may have been resolved. But I won't try this again until the next CeroWRT release. I backed off to Open WRT for the time being, which doesn't have the issue. --=20 Jim Reisert AD1C, , http://www.ad1c.us