From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-vk1-xa34.google.com (mail-vk1-xa34.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::a34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B5D43B29E for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2023 12:06:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-vk1-xa34.google.com with SMTP id 71dfb90a1353d-461b408594fso2255498e0c.1 for ; Mon, 05 Jun 2023 09:06:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1685981214; x=1688573214; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=o1dng7vcDgPGy+FiyDl0pE4kpPVsiL2/atC6vwP5xXU=; b=Z+zw1X9f3G3EDIXoM4dPSr+/eutLZ+M1nFrOA/5+2FrWbIMcbpYFK3g/AcSbAx6T0S tL0D8qSVZJS7budvcBuYHORSa7K66w+VDVnbMBYvcQE4wR/tA0ULdovTRoKeR1TIIT0k WdET3PlOTF3g6j5UPQRKPJpL24MGRukjCSh77hLRwCQ/lvypVN2rfWAmck58VZTSfwlB xHAqKjqJOWApmMe2e9ZkB/NzSHYH+aH+CRFV/idt62mr2YfVQwHgfSVWgM8CA1w0Yg0g 1V0ZqGihpoD06odqjpNKrnrgC5a4M7ELQCGQOR3uP+umbhuYLPzvhRTb6QfPkjgwokVC Kdpg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1685981214; x=1688573214; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=o1dng7vcDgPGy+FiyDl0pE4kpPVsiL2/atC6vwP5xXU=; b=JPbylWJZAMQXaG1v+VLkmJT1OKazt6Me/B3X7oZoJx5zcM/7GpT8zhAK644YNVF4ce g92babqyF3aFzHQgCEd/7yF3RyCH/JA3x7q8fprPVIquP3LJx2XCGU8iePMhNJCP2fDR xL0nUINmL9iUnQyATGs/EW9KR0DYQIpFsUml0wH6T96RuGTNV4v4xeBbWbDKzoSZANoG xOhQM1Xbxr1lUJuAKLr/34fSOBeX+6kFod0668+zhsderb9iFx+ygNnUTN2tKE+GKAKs orCU3CBLjil2ZdiOwOG8z576pKhDieUuacXNP3hBuANNixKGCK32kPG+YFCnEGGQen+R rCyg== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDxjgMKKCWriQpOHW2qJSnTeBPW2oXaTeZw+3TBFo/ASNquP+3B3 kMNlUqIwWd6AWVIzWjDeAmq5tV1AI7fy45vXseQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ6RtSzGS44W4XZlEN33MmYW0DlOYrRPTqq5x/wkO/S85x/2vGDBduLDd35c5JGzRrN1+dV2lhboL8A9QVySHYQ= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6122:182a:b0:458:8ee3:cad9 with SMTP id ay42-20020a056122182a00b004588ee3cad9mr6400047vkb.8.1685981214394; Mon, 05 Jun 2023 09:06:54 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <58238rpr-80q1-3p5s-849q-604ns5659s7r@ynat.uz> In-Reply-To: <58238rpr-80q1-3p5s-849q-604ns5659s7r@ynat.uz> From: "Luis A. Cornejo" Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2023 11:06:43 -0500 Message-ID: To: David Lang Cc: John D , bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000061cbf505fd641738" Subject: Re: [Bloat] Dual WAN home router with decent SQM? X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2023 16:06:55 -0000 --00000000000061cbf505fd641738 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I=E2=80=99ve done the multi wan with mwan3 and it works fine for load balan= ce or failover. But if you are trying to improve your upload then the best you can get is one upload vs the other. You won=E2=80=99t get both uploads to the same str= eam, that is bonding, which is a little harder to do. -Luis On Sun, Jun 4, 2023 at 9:35 AM David Lang via Bloat < bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote: > any router that you can run OpenWRT on will do the job > look at the mwan3 package to mange the multiple ISPs > > at 100Mb, you don't need an especially beefy router. > > David Lang > > On Sun, 4 Jun 2023, John D > via Bloat wrote: > > > Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2023 09:48:21 +0100 > > From: John D via Bloat > > Reply-To: John D > > To: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net > > Subject: [Bloat] Dual WAN home router with decent SQM? > > > > I want to set up a new home router with SQM support to alleviate (mostl= y > > upload) bloat. > > However I would also like dual ISP support, more for backup/failover th= an > > load sharing. > > I can see affordable multi wan "load balancer" routers eg TP-link, and > > affordable SQM routers such as ubiquity Edgerouter, but I'm struggling = to > > find a single device providing both. > > Just after any advice on a) am I better having two separate components = b) > > if so any suggestions which product/brand? > > Two devices means more configuration but possibly more flexible and > cheaper. > > > > My internet speed is looking to max out around 100/20mbps so I don't ne= ed > > Gbit performance. Thanks for any help. > >_______________________________________________ > Bloat mailing list > Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat > _______________________________________________ > Bloat mailing list > Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat > --00000000000061cbf505fd641738 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I=E2=80=99ve done the multi wan with mwan3 and it works f= ine for load balance or failover.

But if you are trying to improve your upload then the best you ca= n get is one upload vs the other. You won=E2=80=99t get both uploads to the= same stream, that is bonding, which is a little harder to do.

-Luis

On Sun, Jun 4, 2023 at 9:3= 5 AM David Lang via Bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
any = router that you can run OpenWRT on will do the job
look at the mwan3 package to mange the multiple ISPs

at 100Mb, you don't need an especially beefy router.

David Lang

On Sun, 4 Jun 2023, John D
via Bloat wrote:

> Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2023 09:48:21 +0100
> From: John D via Bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
> Reply-To: John D <j.w.r.dexter@gmail.com>
> To: b= loat@lists.bufferbloat.net
> Subject: [Bloat] Dual WAN home router with decent SQM?
>
> I want to set up a new home router with SQM support to alleviate (most= ly
> upload) bloat.
> However I would also like dual ISP support, more for backup/failover t= han
> load sharing.
> I can see affordable multi wan "load balancer" routers eg TP= -link, and
> affordable SQM routers such as ubiquity Edgerouter, but I'm strugg= ling to
> find a single device providing both.
> Just after any advice on a) am I better having two separate components= b)
> if so any suggestions which product/brand?
> Two devices means more configuration but possibly more flexible and ch= eaper.
>
> My internet speed is looking to max out around 100/20mbps so I don'= ;t need
> Gbit performance. Thanks for any help.
>_______________________________________________
Bloat mailing list
Bloat@list= s.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
_______________________________________________
Bloat mailing list
Bloat@list= s.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
--00000000000061cbf505fd641738--