From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm1-x32e.google.com (mail-wm1-x32e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC5F63B29E for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2022 11:56:00 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-wm1-x32e.google.com with SMTP id l1-20020a05600c4f0100b00389645443d2so5710329wmq.2 for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2022 08:56:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=dC6xTF9qrQ0XqCRIiqBqNqz/GDYxBw4hx0FPM0pAA/o=; b=BoOyKKQrqynSBHUCpSg6UHaaiyy4hBbfb0SxSyFI8xsBGtAObrFRf0TTMHXZYDWlO1 jSP3JCm+WHRZ6sKJkLvix3UkJK0R42q/XsvnfChk5QLuirt9JVeRjuPPpHPoXUdwCDgU Rr5LST28slu8E5h3wJXeWmt8xDmOXHl9L1gJqqJ2qlOoqFr8h2P9z1XluMAg2SKaY0zJ 9MIZ3drgs2L3wA/JBs/T3lZW1egDNRNMePN9F/tByOxme2ZRCzKYFohhCu92Bj9tRYw5 kFirkEu7bNEKRz5SKEOyi2BGQxNeXPH5Gka+Bw+dHtYIRsSIMqoCDFMd14GTU4kI1Smm wTQA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=dC6xTF9qrQ0XqCRIiqBqNqz/GDYxBw4hx0FPM0pAA/o=; b=Ti9e1Lea3sRyPtOZaZFcXeg7dxymO4oVeFauLK1voqY0VzcSyPVmlM5WrhdMGrKrYS 5/UhoURJz5aPsFjUMPJieRqPQqU8CN66RpE9usDhMgKVNUSxHWKSjCTSrFA1MgL7X10R H01JjdsAhYZk5AsqRQQcJUIr6PciRJivHNxwgnAPlKQgGAd84tmxpLKoUWo6th4eWOgx kdGwD7Q5qU/MA2EgRVWFBxpO92w/KbjkijgJRuWYyytm2dA96CLoXifcf6Yamb45g3dF U8Sn5uWmXHwMA7g+qSGJcfMVrXA1XGGVc/IdVnC93ayEhEURYM1LyCr4LJgjK4ISUkcH vofA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531b6RVDqFKWE08/o4h7aaqxDPziJ8s5TElcKFfbXOJflXhM9C6j CJvDI66uVOcH8EdDQvo+sd2jmq9KIlIY9d03IYBuepcf X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwihj870J8n7V9gYOKi0ZrvGIAJ10pNy7WYSjnWYs6MOh5H4c9elOJzQpGaHdNgoUtGIukZnXA7OkvGx/eouGg= X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c8c2:0:b0:389:9746:847c with SMTP id f2-20020a7bc8c2000000b003899746847cmr16582574wml.156.1647017759468; Fri, 11 Mar 2022 08:55:59 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <5DF0ABD0-8753-41CA-8B58-681ECC5CB14A@cable.comcast.com> In-Reply-To: <5DF0ABD0-8753-41CA-8B58-681ECC5CB14A@cable.comcast.com> From: "Luis A. Cornejo" Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2022 10:55:48 -0600 Message-ID: To: "Livingood, Jason" Cc: bloat Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000007deffa05d9f4349a" Subject: Re: [Bloat] FWA Test Results X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2022 16:56:01 -0000 --0000000000007deffa05d9f4349a Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable That unloaded ping off pretty good, it must be from 5G SA. I=E2=80=99m with T-Mobile no 5G SA yet, I=E2=80=99m in the 60s for unloaded. On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 1:51 PM Livingood, Jason via Bloat < bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote: > This is from a colleague that was using 5G FWA at home. Their computer wa= s > connected to the gateway via Ethernet and the gateway was next to a glass > door with LoS to the tower ~0.25 mi away (no tree/leaf or other > obstructions). So definitely a best case for location in the home & > connectivity to the RAN and no competing LAN traffic at the time of the > test. > > > > > https://www.waveform.com/tools/bufferbloat?test-id=3D55167384-3ee5-4f5d-a= 1ea-131458b231f6 > > > > Jason > _______________________________________________ > Bloat mailing list > Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat > --0000000000007deffa05d9f4349a Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
That unloaded ping off pretty good, it must be from 5G SA= . I=E2=80=99m with T-Mobile no 5G SA yet, I=E2=80=99m in the 60s for unload= ed.=C2=A0

On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 1:51 PM Livingood, Jason via Bloat &= lt;bloat@lists.bufferbloat.n= et> wrote:

This is f= rom a colleague that was using 5G FWA at home. Their computer was connected= to the gateway via Ethernet and the gateway was next to a glass door with = LoS to the tower ~0.25 mi away (no tree/leaf or other obstructions). So definitely a best case for location i= n the home & connectivity to the RAN and no competing LAN traffic at th= e time of the test.

=C2=A0<= /span>

https://www.waveform.com/tools/bufferbloat?test-id= =3D55167384-3ee5-4f5d-a1ea-131458b231f6

=C2=A0<= /span>

Jason

_______________________________________________
Bloat mailing list
Bloat@list= s.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
--0000000000007deffa05d9f4349a--