From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-oa1-x32.google.com (mail-oa1-x32.google.com [IPv6:2001:4860:4864:20::32]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DB343B29D for ; Wed, 31 May 2023 11:57:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-oa1-x32.google.com with SMTP id 586e51a60fabf-1a208e249e3so302156fac.2 for ; Wed, 31 May 2023 08:57:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1685548629; x=1688140629; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=4qnVlSE53/amsVOjdr075w+Q1dGE+WfnIP80jDU4IGs=; b=TFa0T/UqEBGtEmLKBPq6L2Y5eXCVgg3uVcwk8+DtBdYRYFnSZouUpPMgmxSaaTE1JB XHuRNQ76X2GaZ7yeQ4Irr2sGnbD8dH02lUfar4eqzEfmfM5ehA24J3xXkxIuBcDt2YhA KNCO05dRxSl4zN5uNgSymjE3Ftnzs4Qp6oDzmulyQO6eOBPozr5U3XUBh8hQExbiwZCb hZaP7UVC6/qSnSdVw4KpA9TqQDuelumvsOPETpb+QG8YPvUwJ05c688NeJWnbQt2816P X9PAJO7A6ncw2B4ZBZ3yqO1iRj+iRUN0Ao7iJZ1X9UvbmjUEY/IDs38Xl2XfyinuVaOH jrmw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1685548629; x=1688140629; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=4qnVlSE53/amsVOjdr075w+Q1dGE+WfnIP80jDU4IGs=; b=Vtrwzk+SgCgFGubHr0U/p/2ifyVZUCaK9A3ovw9RMYEdyeR/DpxgayCqN+xvt/3g0Q ETC8LGRFae2TJ8aPTfNaZ+JsWNfUrXnBeJO7UFNZVqwTVqKSEiL+aJ5LVKFNoEhM7ZEH s4oihr+TSNW/c0HgWD1mwkrrHSCrKpOEKaFl6wMlTCP0UyUMsOezkY4FnpB94ypBQYKq wgclnNWZ9ZkAi0VQnQWyughRkAIWj+mVgXVDDNJAqDpnI+SDKgZZk9eBmFLtn5WxmGt+ 93NMhGvRhrspRTrSfDrif0M0Yy+7pOmv3/UCt6piAMrsJIF4q2LyDCN4jJ54BvYcmXBN 2Oog== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDwi8lxQLuxb4zB4lacuh+PshOOTueiNEidt3oMdrHzX4Owbx5+t s0aClxW05eznrKC+FM65aW1LcIgWVXLBaedithtdyzXw8wc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ6xaoiJ03o5ZM3iikB58Y99Ozys06mD/H6pHmCuFCz+s4BK0MMDrRZrTq7+KJNvc3tnujd6htjLGH+/xyFXmK0= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:c345:b0:19f:1b43:5840 with SMTP id e5-20020a056870c34500b0019f1b435840mr3907105oak.37.1685548629605; Wed, 31 May 2023 08:57:09 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: John D Message-ID: To: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000051c26705fcff5f03" X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 29 Jun 2023 18:46:40 -0400 Subject: [Bloat] Does SQM always require you to tell it your ISP up/down speed? X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 15:57:10 -0000 X-Original-Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 16:56:58 +0100 X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 15:57:10 -0000 --00000000000051c26705fcff5f03 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sorry for the noob question I am considering Ubiquiti EdgeRouter since it has good reviews, SQM and is on the list here https://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/bloat/wiki/What_can_I_do_about_Bufferbloat/ I see the need to configure your typical up/down link capacity for it to work properly. Is this the norm? I perhaps naively assumed these smart algorithms would work on queue size regardless of link speed - which can vary. My ISP varies on upload between 4-8mbps so IIRC that means I need to tune SQM at the low end, but this means when performance is better it will still be capped... or have I misunderstood and it will still utilise the additional capacity on good days? Thanks. --00000000000051c26705fcff5f03 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sorry for the noob question I am considering Ubiquiti Edge= Router since it has good reviews, SQM and is on the list here=C2=A0https://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/bloat/wiki/What_can_I_do_ab= out_Bufferbloat/
I see the need to configure your typical up/down l= ink capacity for it to work properly.
Is this the norm? I perhaps= naively assumed these smart algorithms would work on queue size regardless= of link speed - which can vary.
My ISP varies on upload between = 4-8mbps so IIRC that means I need to tune SQM at the low end, but this mean= s when performance is better it will still be capped... or have I misunders= tood and it will still utilise the additional capacity on good days?
<= div>
Thanks.
--00000000000051c26705fcff5f03--