From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-yk0-x22a.google.com (mail-yk0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BAD521FB0D for ; Tue, 28 Jul 2015 21:32:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by ykba194 with SMTP id a194so10865599ykb.0 for ; Tue, 28 Jul 2015 21:32:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=WrDocpxBORp/0dpSiJZeOXijLXeRrkvd+Vm3r50Nsrc=; b=VNj8tr4AbFi+RGKM1ihHeW5LqxR/ZxHNjq2q4vnZllXfn3HLvO0NT+W6FyQv0pWffO FedXYcr3Hpuz0qwR/T80aR3Oygij1khTUe2srL9FnsJsRW7VNBC24wCYucFLxpY5Xe+S gvJ6PF4j+ZUUYfio8Mzb5friV6Q7rtRRgQ7tF3+FkbvRS28FqZsAsLFO0IIDg+Cnh3y+ 40dbnRDC3x/CzG2o3N1S5DPtWlVG1FQCIA16qrCVrG0npwONHRZaPUdLyrGY7FUSXie1 QOD0uWWiRoYquOHYUnZOZW0szW7VDtCmqBpXQHUHs9DhPMobgeC5gIP8B0+oiMy7KACc jpiA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.129.70.69 with SMTP id t66mr41622231ywa.4.1438144368637; Tue, 28 Jul 2015 21:32:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.37.47.133 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Jul 2015 21:32:48 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 21:32:48 -0700 Message-ID: From: Rosen Penev To: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: [Bloat] Kirkwood BQL? X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 04:33:18 -0000 Anyone know what the situation is with kirkwood and BQL? I found a patch for it but have no idea if there are any issues. I have such a system but have no idea how to ascertain the efficacy of BQL.