From: Aaron Wood <woody77@gmail.com>
To: bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Bloat] [aqm] DOCSIS 3.1 support for AQM
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 14:23:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALQXh-NBWoeCOt_CS65c3NKM3p_cs19a+BjBUi+qzb2j8UF7=w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <527213F5.6060406@kit.edu>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 907 bytes --]
> Thanks for the information. I'd be interested in why you have chosen
> PIE, e.g., instead of sfq-CoDel. Any pointers to evaluation
> reports/results? Last time I saw a presentation on this it seemed
> that CoDel was performing quite well.
>
I think this cablelabs report makes the argument for PIE:
http://www.cablelabs.com/downloads/pubs/Active_Queue_Management_Algorithms_DOCSIS_3_0.pdf
Mostly in that in the heavy traffic scenarios, PIE outperforms sfq_codel,
and in general is a tad bit better than codel, with a simpler
implementation (I think). Although I think I take issue with the "heavy
traffic" model, but I'm guessing (hoping) that it's based on surveys of
customer traffic. 60-110 upstream flows seems like a lot. But it's based
around a heavy use of BitTorrent, so maybe that's reasonable for some
people.
But in all other cases, sfq really blows the doors off of the others.
-Aaron
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1440 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-31 13:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-30 20:13 [Bloat] " Greg White
2013-10-31 8:25 ` [Bloat] [aqm] " Bless, Roland (TM)
2013-10-31 13:23 ` Aaron Wood [this message]
2013-10-31 14:32 ` Michael Richardson
2013-11-04 23:20 ` Greg White
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CALQXh-NBWoeCOt_CS65c3NKM3p_cs19a+BjBUi+qzb2j8UF7=w@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=woody77@gmail.com \
--cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox