From: Aaron Wood <woody77@gmail.com>
To: Colin Dearborn <Colin.Dearborn@sjrb.ca>
Cc: bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Bloat] different speeds on different ports? (benchmarking fun)
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 08:16:19 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALQXh-NPU2kCwtMXzg0bi-22VBzVCYjZdj9G0g7zn1-bp0TFZA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALQXh-NALDu=-XQ6yFoC8mSnx7yZ1XoMQR7pzf6As8y0gYKMWg@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2825 bytes --]
The friend of mine that I've been working with brought up a cloud node
somewhere with ubuntu and netperf on it, and from another location
(business internet) able to consistently get better throughput from his
cloud node setup than from the flent-fremont node. We're starting to think
that it's something about that node in particular. It seems to have a
125Mbps cap (so I guess about a 140-150Mbps line-rate cap?).
What kind of node is it running on?
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 8:13 AM, Aaron Wood <woody77@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'd wondered about single vs. multiple, but I'm getting pretty consistent
> speeds from the flent-fremont node irrespective of the number of streams
> that I use (1, 4, 12, etc).
>
> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 7:50 AM, Colin Dearborn <Colin.Dearborn@sjrb.ca>
> wrote:
>
>> This is my guess.
>>
>> DSL reports uses many streams from different servers to achieve these
>> speeds.
>>
>> I’m assuming flent is a single stream, so you’re at the mercy of TCP
>> receive windows and latency limiting how fast you can go on that single
>> stream.
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Bloat [mailto:bloat-bounces@lists.bufferbloat.net] *On Behalf Of
>> *Aaron Wood
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, August 29, 2017 11:16 PM
>> *To:* bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
>> *Subject:* [Bloat] different speeds on different ports? (benchmarking
>> fun)
>>
>>
>>
>> I don't have a full writeup yet, but wanted to ask if people on here have
>> run into this.
>>
>>
>>
>> I'm seeing a disparity between flent and the dslreports speed tests. On
>> my connection at home (Comcast 150/12), I figured it was something related
>> to the test implementations, but minor. But on a connect at a friend with
>> business-class Comcast (300/12), we're seeing a huge difference. Flent
>> can't seem to achieve more than 120Mbps, often with an early, couple-second
>> hump at a much higher speed. But dslreports' speed tests gets the full
>> 300Mbps.
>>
>>
>>
>> In looking closer at my connection, with sqm (cake) turned off, I'm
>> seeing ~180Mbps download with 500ms of bufferbloat when I use the
>> dslreports test (http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/20805152).
>>
>>
>>
>> Yet flent can't come close to that, even with the tcp_12down test:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> The current hypothesis that we have is that this is due to either traffic
>> class, or the ports that traffic are running on. I've ruled out the ping
>> streams, as a parallel set of netperf tcp_maerts downloads has the same
>> 120Mbps roof.
>>
>>
>>
>> It would be interesting if we could run some netperf tests using port
>> 80/443 for the listening socket for the data connection (although if doing
>> deep-packet inspection, we might need to use an actual HTTP transfer).
>>
>>
>>
>> -Aaron
>>
>
>
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 5396 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: image002.png --]
[-- Type: image/png, Size: 38956 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-21 15:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-30 5:15 Aaron Wood
2017-09-21 2:06 ` Dave Taht
2017-09-21 2:34 ` Dave Taht
2017-09-21 10:58 ` Stefan Alfredsson
2017-09-21 11:16 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2017-09-21 12:51 ` Sebastian Moeller
2017-09-22 0:26 ` David Lang
2017-09-21 14:50 ` Colin Dearborn
2017-09-21 15:13 ` Aaron Wood
2017-09-21 15:16 ` Aaron Wood [this message]
2017-09-23 2:51 ` Aaron Wood
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CALQXh-NPU2kCwtMXzg0bi-22VBzVCYjZdj9G0g7zn1-bp0TFZA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=woody77@gmail.com \
--cc=Colin.Dearborn@sjrb.ca \
--cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox