Re: [Bloat] fcc input

[Aaron Wood <woody77@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1733 bytes --]

I'm still surprised at how hard it is to get people to understand that the
problem they're having (especially with real-time video like Zoom) isn't
bandwidth, but jitter and bloat...

On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 12:52 PM Jonathan Foulkes <jf@jonathanfoulkes.com>
wrote:

> Agreed, we need to be more vocal.
>
> I did look up my home address, and wonder of wonders it was mostly correct.
>
> Windstream claims they provide fiber (1000/1000) in my census track, but
> the only fiber they have goes to their HFC nodes that then feeds coax to
> the home. Best one can get is 1000/35. Not that I’m complaining, as I was
> stuck on 12 / 0.76 DSL for >decade.
>
> So ISPs are stretching the truth with some of the self-reported info.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Jonathan
>
> > On Mar 23, 2021, at 12:11 AM, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> https://www.theverge.com/2021/3/22/22345533/fcc-broadband-data-collection-program-fix-the-internet
> >
> > Although I would like to pull together a loud and organized campaign
> > about bufferbloat
> > to the FCC, a few letters here or there, might start to help. We could
> > definitely use some new rhetoric....
> >
> > --
> > "For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public
> > relations, for Mother Nature cannot be fooled" - Richard Feynman
> >
> > dave@taht.net <Dave Täht> CTO, TekLibre, LLC Tel: 1-831-435-0729
> > _______________________________________________
> > Bloat mailing list
> > Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
> > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bloat mailing list
> Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2777 bytes --]