From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ie0-x235.google.com (mail-ie0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D24EC21F1B1 for ; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 13:22:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ie0-f181.google.com with SMTP id ar20so8533085iec.12 for ; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 13:22:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=KnEAuK2ZsnDWakx5wD3M/RxYat9eR/c/2Qng/7Yg2YA=; b=UtmU0wTwwgSatDq3/JtW65r8CIhoay55HM+rP76EIYY8wb0yj8lk8qZg5wRhczaiP/ G4bbv2Rw1TGxdkp0RY/wZHxwLa4E/owxi2mtE1ubvxvBQTzgJojRgSTV0vYm0JfQrynO gACV8B85DZmCU5A27AIOaZ4wleZRpQV85Gwqhy2OVZb698ea2NhkBQ569MOWNwp97uPL 0Pp9Iy0+7FBscDNigCDvoj+kl3WJIcwbLONzKQR61mHnj/WeAcPqVCxFXgf5i8yoaeu2 awkRIMaV45nVEKEptwp5U1v1EkxGll0dNdKUzXNDzNZ5FScyGO7IqaH0ry5H+fhgsyg8 YUrw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.43.154.18 with SMTP id lc18mr3044892icc.41.1383337323219; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 13:22:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.241.195 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 13:22:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20131030162534.29f34ada@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> <5271BAA7.2080905@kau.se> <20131031023257.GB3365@lists.bufferbloat.net> <52724CA9.4020606@kau.se> Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 21:22:03 +0100 Message-ID: From: Aaron Wood To: bloat Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c2d6ecc14ee004ea235116 Subject: Re: [Bloat] mobile broadband buffer bloat X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 20:22:05 -0000 --001a11c2d6ecc14ee004ea235116 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I find the notion of LTE that's faster than DSL somewhat amazing, still. (jealous) -Aaron On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote: > On Thu, 31 Oct 2013, Dave Taht wrote: > > I'm really impressed you can get ~72Mbit down and ~4Mbit up. (closer to 8 >> up when you consider acks) Note also the relationship between bandwidth and >> latency at T+22... >> > > http://www.induowireless.com/**nu/gsm-3g-4g-frekvensband/ > > Basically the swedish operators have more frequencies available to them > than the US ones, and the country is more sparsely populated. Especially > the 20Mhz available per operator in 2600MHz makes a huge difference. Even > initial deployment of 4G in Sweden meant one was able to regularily get 80 > megabit/s of download speed. Now with a lot of users this is of course > less, but sometimes if you're alone in the cell you can still get this. I'm > actually surprised that they only get 8 up, usually much more up speed > should be possible. > > (I used to work for one of the swedish mobile operators) > > -- > Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se > > ______________________________**_________________ > Bloat mailing list > Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/**listinfo/bloat > --001a11c2d6ecc14ee004ea235116 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I find the notion of LTE that's faster than DSL somewh= at amazing, still.

(jealous)

-A= aron


On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>= ; wrote:
On Thu, 31 Oct 2013, Dave Taht wrote:

I'm really impressed you can get ~72Mbit down and ~4Mbit up. (closer to= 8 up when you consider acks) Note also the relationship between bandwidth = and latency at T+22...

http://www.induowireless.com/nu/gsm-3g-4g-frekvensb= and/

Basically the swedish operators have more frequencies available to them tha= n the US ones, and the country is more sparsely populated. Especially the 2= 0Mhz available per operator in 2600MHz makes a huge difference. Even initia= l deployment of 4G in Sweden meant one was able to regularily get 80 megabi= t/s of download speed. Now with a lot of users this is of course less, but = sometimes if you're alone in the cell you can still get this. I'm a= ctually surprised that they only get 8 up, usually much more up speed shoul= d be possible.

(I used to work for one of the swedish mobile operators)

--
Mikael Abrahamsson =A0 =A0email: swmike@swm.pp.se

_______________________________________________
Bloat mailing list
Bloat@list= s.bufferbloat.net
= https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat

--001a11c2d6ecc14ee004ea235116--