From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ie0-x235.google.com (mail-ie0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75FB221F2A4; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 08:12:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ie0-f181.google.com with SMTP id rp18so9821518iec.12 for ; Wed, 03 Sep 2014 08:12:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=R4RvfE3QoRAZAQV9GaQcoRolH01YqG43kWgG+YZ7jjo=; b=KBhLy46EXTtFpsFfl9CrNQs05JUhSccW2mVrts2FnRvqubBa61Cokbqe1ohx3w7k1+ mA6UXzMAp+bhAC85eoqoCtsmR/oV6J2FTj1RrKnJZMHc9QBGMXDAxfSICXxOBsVL0tqT zlXj4rQNCNH3dCPtsTqtYgJLXARWBdDgnYZmMt1VafSGDhwepilea/GssVDJh+t+PYD5 rFzKVwPpqfY3SarJH03+9Tj1ydlOWEV2A7aAJ/B5EGFCfc1PWussSc8aR/3gVHxanCTb qAqIGCcn+0LhhH72gwxwTpLvDh784PkeW22dtFhIv0bQJZy76PeWpYqNIWDf4BIYGQWv wTDw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.43.136.134 with SMTP id ik6mr39317420icc.6.1409757151139; Wed, 03 Sep 2014 08:12:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.243.196 with HTTP; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 08:12:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <0D3E3220-C12A-4238-974B-D83D13EF354E@gmail.com> References: <87ppfijfjc.fsf@toke.dk> <4FF4917C-1B6D-4D5F-81B6-5FC177F12BFC@gmail.com> <4DA71387-6720-4A2F-B462-2E1295604C21@gmail.com> <0DB9E121-7073-4DE9-B7E2-73A41BCBA1D1@gmail.com> <0D3E3220-C12A-4238-974B-D83D13EF354E@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2014 08:12:30 -0700 Message-ID: From: Aaron Wood To: Jonathan Morton Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c21a38369ecb05022aaa5f Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" , bloat Subject: Re: [Bloat] Comcast upped service levels -> WNDR3800 can't cope... X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 15:12:32 -0000 --001a11c21a38369ecb05022aaa5f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 4:08 AM, Jonathan Morton wrote: > Given that the CPU load is confirmed as high, the pcap probably isn't as > useful. The rest would be interesting to look at. > > Are you able to test with smaller packet sizes? That might help to > isolate packet-throughput (ie. connection tracking) versus byte-throughput > problems. > > - Jonathan Morton > Doing another test setup will take a few days (maybe not until the weekend). But I can get the data uploaded, and do some preliminary crunching on it. -Aaron --001a11c21a38369ecb05022aaa5f Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 4:08 AM, Jonathan Morton=C2=A0<chromatix99@gmail.com>=C2=A0wrote:
Given= that the CPU load is confirmed as high, the pcap probably isn't as use= ful.=C2=A0 The rest would be interesting to look at.
=
Are you able to test with smaller packet sizes?=C2=A0 That might help t= o isolate packet-throughput (ie. connection tracking) versus byte-throughpu= t problems.

=C2=A0- Jonathan Morton
=C2=A0
Doing another test setup will= take a few days (maybe not until the weekend). =C2=A0But I can get the dat= a uploaded, and do some preliminary crunching on it.

-Aaron
--001a11c21a38369ecb05022aaa5f--