From: Aaron Wood <woody77@gmail.com>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Cc: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@toke.dk>,
bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Bloat] Still seeing bloat with a DOCSIS 3.1 modem
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2020 16:52:47 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALQXh-OZvOJAdEFwTMBAOWOb-d-k88jMrjRW6L-KJJjeR7Z8-Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw6si04dfkqypVcG2SyuQ5tUE4U5Qv4O+15upLn=zo3GmA@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2608 bytes --]
On Sun, Mar 29, 2020 at 12:58 PM Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
> I just finished doing my first openwrt build in a couple years. (with
> AQL) Trying to summon up the moxie to try it. Found my soldiering iron
> and usb to serial interfaces....
>
That's kept me from rolling my own... I have the interfaces, but not the
energy to deal with the troubleshooting. I think I still have an old
WNDR3700 in a box somewhere that I could prep as a backup, but I'd rather
not go through the hassle.
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 8:58 AM Aaron Wood <woody77@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > One other thought I've had with this, is that the apu2 is multi-core,
> and the i210 is multi-queue.
> >
> > Cake/htb aren't, iirc, setup to run on multiple cores (as the rate
> limiters then don't talk to each other). But with the correct tuple
> hashing in the i210, I _should_ be able to split things and do two cores at
> 500Mbps each (with lots of compute left over).
>
> A good test might be sch_mq + cake bandwidth whatever for each hw
> queue. irqbalancing also may or may not help.
>
Bandwidth = 1Gbps or 500Mbps? (I was thinking 500Mbps for that test setup).
> > Obviously, that puts a limit on single-connection rates, but as the
> number of connections climb, they should more or less even out (I remember
> Dave Taht showing the oddities that happen with say 4 streams and 2 cores,
> where it's common to end up with 3 streams on the same core). But assuming
> that the hashing function results in even sharing of streams, it should be
> fairly balanced (after plotting some binomial distributions with higher "n"
> values). Still not perfect, especially since streams aren't likely to all
> be elephants.
>
> One reason why we are seeing "tcp rack" pushed so hard is due to cable
> modems having multiple channels, and thus ooo packets are probable
> when you try to push a stream across those channels.
>
I don't know anything about the channels and how they're bonded. separate
packets on each, or symbols that are spread across all the channels that
are used to construct a packet in less time..? I'd expect to see more out
of order packets than I do, if they were using them all separately. But
then none of the tests really do single-stream gigabit.
> Me, I'm reasonably confident we've hit the age of "peak bandwidth" for
> most things at up/dl rates above 40Mbit.
>
Very little of what I do gets to high (>50Mbps) rates. But those that do,
I'm glad it's there.
> And in the real world at home, a couple hash collissions and unequal
> distribution really don't matter for real traffic.
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3960 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-29 23:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-25 5:01 Aaron Wood
2020-03-25 5:02 ` Aaron Wood
2020-03-25 5:29 ` Matt Taggart
2020-03-25 6:19 ` Sebastian Moeller
2020-03-25 15:46 ` Aaron Wood
2020-03-25 8:58 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-03-25 9:04 ` Sebastian Moeller
2020-03-25 11:03 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-03-25 15:44 ` Aaron Wood
2020-03-25 15:57 ` Aaron Wood
2020-03-25 19:18 ` Dave Taht
2020-03-28 22:46 ` Aaron Wood
2020-03-29 19:58 ` Dave Taht
2020-03-29 23:52 ` Aaron Wood [this message]
2020-03-25 18:13 ` Jim Gettys
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CALQXh-OZvOJAdEFwTMBAOWOb-d-k88jMrjRW6L-KJJjeR7Z8-Q@mail.gmail.com \
--to=woody77@gmail.com \
--cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
--cc=toke@toke.dk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox