General list for discussing Bufferbloat
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Aaron Wood <woody77@gmail.com>
To: Giuseppe De Luca <dropheaders@gmx.com>
Cc: bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Bloat] Really getting 1G out of ISP?
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2021 15:31:46 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALQXh-OwnqcFBhx+uy9_83eHF3Xh3iAsNkDyFN+TOH_KJBTVvg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2dbdf457-5652-6b74-7014-3bf79dde6bc9@gmx.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2670 bytes --]

I'm running an Odyssey from Seeed Studios (celeron J4125 with dual i211),
and it can handle Cake at 1Gbps on a single core (which it needs to,
because OpenWRT's i211 support still has multiple receive queues disabled).

On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 12:44 AM Giuseppe De Luca <dropheaders@gmx.com>
wrote:

> Also a PC Engines APU4 will do the job
> (https://inonius.net/results/?userId=17996087f5e8 - this is a
> 1gbit/1gbit, with Openwrt/sqm-scripts set to 900/900.  ISP is Sony NURO
> in Japan). Will follow this thread to know if some interesting device
> popup :)
>
>
> https://inonius.net/results/?userId=17996087f5e8
>
> On 6/22/2021 6:12 AM, Sebastian Moeller wrote:
> >
> > On 22 June 2021 06:00:48 CEST, Stephen Hemminger <
> stephen@networkplumber.org> wrote:
> >> Is there any consumer hardware that can actually keep up and do AQM at
> >> 1Gbit.
> >          Over in the OpenWrt forums the same question pops up routinely
> once per week. The best answer ATM seems to be a combination of a raspberry
> pi4B with a decent USB3 gigabit ethernet dongle, a managed switch and any
> capable (OpenWrt) AP of the user's liking. With 4 arm A72 cores the will
> traffic shape up to a gigabit as reported by multiple users.
> >
> >
> >> It seems everyone seems obsessed with gamer Wifi 6. But can only do
> >> 300Mbit single
> >> stream with any kind of QoS.
> > IIUC most commercial home routers/APs bet on offload engines to do most
> of the heavy lifting, but as far as I understand only the NSS cores have a
> shaper and fq_codel module....
> >
> >
> >> It doesn't help that all the local ISP's claim 10Mbit upload even with
> >> 1G download.
> >> Is this a head end provisioning problem or related to Docsis 3.0 (or
> >> later) modems?
> > For DOCSIS the issue seems to be an unfortunate frequency split between
> up and downstream and use of lower efficiency coding schemes .
> > Over here the incumbent cable isp provisions  fifty Mbps for upstream
> and plans to increase that to hundred once the upstream is switched to
> docsis 3.1.
> > I believe one issue is that since most of the upstream is required for
> the reverse ACK traffic for the download and hence it can not be
> oversubscribed too much.... but I think we have real docsis experts on the
> list, so I will stop my speculation here...
> >
> > Regards
> >           Sebastian
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Bloat mailing list
> >> Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
> >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
> _______________________________________________
> Bloat mailing list
> Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3843 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2021-07-06 22:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-22  4:00 Stephen Hemminger
2021-06-22  6:12 ` Sebastian Moeller
2021-06-22  7:44   ` Giuseppe De Luca
2021-07-06 22:31     ` Aaron Wood [this message]
2021-07-07  2:26       ` Dave Taht
2021-07-07  2:53         ` Aaron Wood
2021-07-08 19:56         ` [Bloat] [Cake] " David P. Reed
2021-06-22 23:04   ` [Bloat] " Livingood, Jason
2021-06-23 15:56     ` Stephen Hemminger
2021-07-06 22:13     ` Aaron Wood
2021-07-06 22:28       ` Wheelock, Ian
2021-07-06 22:40         ` Aaron Wood
2021-07-07  2:10         ` Dave Taht
2021-07-07  9:27           ` Wheelock, Ian
2021-07-07 16:17             ` Jonathan Morton
2021-07-07 16:24               ` Wheelock, Ian
2021-06-22 22:51 ` Livingood, Jason
2021-06-29 19:48   ` Stephen Hemminger
2021-06-29 20:09     ` Sebastian Moeller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CALQXh-OwnqcFBhx+uy9_83eHF3Xh3iAsNkDyFN+TOH_KJBTVvg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=woody77@gmail.com \
    --cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=dropheaders@gmx.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox