I'm running an Odyssey from Seeed Studios (celeron J4125 with dual i211),
and it can handle Cake at 1Gbps on a single core (which it needs to,
because OpenWRT's i211 support still has multiple receive queues disabled).

On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 12:44 AM Giuseppe De Luca <dropheaders@gmx.com>
wrote:

> Also a PC Engines APU4 will do the job
> (https://inonius.net/results/?userId=17996087f5e8 - this is a
> 1gbit/1gbit, with Openwrt/sqm-scripts set to 900/900.  ISP is Sony NURO
> in Japan). Will follow this thread to know if some interesting device
> popup :)
>
>
> https://inonius.net/results/?userId=17996087f5e8
>
> On 6/22/2021 6:12 AM, Sebastian Moeller wrote:
> >
> > On 22 June 2021 06:00:48 CEST, Stephen Hemminger <
> stephen@networkplumber.org> wrote:
> >> Is there any consumer hardware that can actually keep up and do AQM at
> >> 1Gbit.
> >          Over in the OpenWrt forums the same question pops up routinely
> once per week. The best answer ATM seems to be a combination of a raspberry
> pi4B with a decent USB3 gigabit ethernet dongle, a managed switch and any
> capable (OpenWrt) AP of the user's liking. With 4 arm A72 cores the will
> traffic shape up to a gigabit as reported by multiple users.
> >
> >
> >> It seems everyone seems obsessed with gamer Wifi 6. But can only do
> >> 300Mbit single
> >> stream with any kind of QoS.
> > IIUC most commercial home routers/APs bet on offload engines to do most
> of the heavy lifting, but as far as I understand only the NSS cores have a
> shaper and fq_codel module....
> >
> >
> >> It doesn't help that all the local ISP's claim 10Mbit upload even with
> >> 1G download.
> >> Is this a head end provisioning problem or related to Docsis 3.0 (or
> >> later) modems?
> > For DOCSIS the issue seems to be an unfortunate frequency split between
> up and downstream and use of lower efficiency coding schemes .
> > Over here the incumbent cable isp provisions  fifty Mbps for upstream
> and plans to increase that to hundred once the upstream is switched to
> docsis 3.1.
> > I believe one issue is that since most of the upstream is required for
> the reverse ACK traffic for the download and hence it can not be
> oversubscribed too much.... but I think we have real docsis experts on the
> list, so I will stop my speculation here...
> >
> > Regards
> >           Sebastian
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Bloat mailing list
> >> Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
> >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
> _______________________________________________
> Bloat mailing list
> Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
>