Re: [Bloat] Bufferbloat and the policy debate on packet loss in nanog

[Aaron Wood <woody77@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1075 bytes --]

But until the silicon vendors update _their_ forks of OpenWRT, commercially
available home routers won't have these benefits.  Because the home router
market is dominated by packaged reference designs from one of a very small
number of companies that actually make all the chipsets (Dave, I know you
know this, I'm mostly just choir-preaching myself).

-Aaron

On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 3:22 PM, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:

> There's nothing new here, but it was a nice rant to get out of my system:
>
> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.org.operators.nanog/128201
>
> Of late, I have been taking a page from Linus Torvalds' playbook, in
> realizing that "on the internet, no-one can hear you being subtle",
> and BOY, am I done with that.
>
> --
> Dave Täht
> Let's make wifi fast, less jittery and reliable again!
>
> https://plus.google.com/u/0/107942175615993706558/posts/TVX3o84jjmb
> _______________________________________________
> Bloat mailing list
> Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1818 bytes --]