From: Aaron Wood <woody77@gmail.com>
To: bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: [Bloat] Still seeing bloat with a DOCSIS 3.1 modem
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 22:01:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALQXh-PpLhvF7oYkNwMq6y9Wt2ziYLXTOyN31T39+Kw8XXZcHw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 805 bytes --]
I recently upgraded service from 150up, 10dn Mbps to xfinity's gigabit
(with 35Mbps up) tier, and picked up a DOCSIS 3.1 modem to go with it.
Flent test results are here:
https://burntchrome.blogspot.com/2020/03/bufferbloat-with-comcast-gigabit-with.html
tl/dr; 1000ms of upstream bufferbloat
But it's DOCSIS 3.1, so why isn't PIE working? Theory: It's in DOCSIS 3.0
upstream mode based on the status LEDs. Hopefully it will go away if I can
convince it to run in DOCSIS 3.1 mode.
At the moment, however, my WRT1900AC isn't up to the task of dealing with
these sorts of downstream rates.
So I'm looking at the apu2, which from this post:
https://forum.openwrt.org/t/comparative-throughput-testing-including-nat-sqm-wireguard-and-openvpn/44724
Will certainly get most of the way there.
Although
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1336 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2020-03-25 5:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-25 5:01 Aaron Wood [this message]
2020-03-25 5:02 ` Aaron Wood
2020-03-25 5:29 ` Matt Taggart
2020-03-25 6:19 ` Sebastian Moeller
2020-03-25 15:46 ` Aaron Wood
2020-03-25 8:58 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-03-25 9:04 ` Sebastian Moeller
2020-03-25 11:03 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-03-25 15:44 ` Aaron Wood
2020-03-25 15:57 ` Aaron Wood
2020-03-25 19:18 ` Dave Taht
2020-03-28 22:46 ` Aaron Wood
2020-03-29 19:58 ` Dave Taht
2020-03-29 23:52 ` Aaron Wood
2020-03-25 18:13 ` Jim Gettys
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CALQXh-PpLhvF7oYkNwMq6y9Wt2ziYLXTOyN31T39+Kw8XXZcHw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=woody77@gmail.com \
--cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox