Not quite UDP, but RTP congestion avoidance is being worked on in the IETF.
Please join us - http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/rmcat/charter/

Kevin Gross
+1-303-447-0517
Media Network Consultant
AVA Networks - www.AVAnw.com <http://www.avanw.com/>, www.X192.org


On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 5:44 AM, Forums1000 <forums1000@gmail.com> wrote:

> I hope I can get a bit more information on what comprises the total
> solution. But knitting it together proves a bit hard (for me at least).
> Without this, it is hard to follow the discussions on the list. Has anyone
> made a summary of how all of this works together?
>
> So:
>
> 1. In order to move the bottleneck to a device under our administrative
> control, we need to shape traffic (we need to become the bottleneck).
> 2. Next, we have the AQM-algorithms that manage the (or a) queue.
> 3. And then there are still issues with multiple flows and with UDP?
>
> From what I understand, we need to shape traffic, and then drop packets
> taking into account that the most aggressive flow (the flow that
> contributes the most to filling a buffer), is the flow that will get the
> most packets dropped. This to prevent the aggressive flow from impacting
> flows that behave better.
>
> Now for UDP, is the problem here that we cannot identify flows, and hence,
> only have one queue for UDP whereas for TCP we can have multiple?
>
> Any good resources are more than welcome:-)!
>
> Thanks,
> Jeroen
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bloat mailing list
> Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
>
>