* [Bloat] starlink
@ 2020-11-30 23:19 Conor Beh
2020-12-01 13:20 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-12-01 14:02 ` Michael Richardson
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Conor Beh @ 2020-11-30 23:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bloat
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 451 bytes --]
Hello,
Jim Gettys made a reddit post on r/Starlink asking for data from beta
testers. I am one of those testers. I spun up an Ubuntu VM and did three
runs of flent and rrul as depicted in the getting started page. You may
find the results here:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1NIGPpCMrJgi8Pb27t9a9VbVOGzsKLE0K/view?usp=sharing
Thanks for all the hard work and I hope you find it interesting. Let me
know if there's anything else you'd like to see.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 612 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bloat] starlink
2020-11-30 23:19 [Bloat] starlink Conor Beh
@ 2020-12-01 13:20 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-12-01 14:39 ` Jonathan Morton
2020-12-01 14:02 ` Michael Richardson
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen @ 2020-12-01 13:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Conor Beh, bloat
Conor Beh <conor@conorbeh.com> writes:
> Hello,
>
> Jim Gettys made a reddit post on r/Starlink asking for data from beta
> testers. I am one of those testers. I spun up an Ubuntu VM and did three
> runs of flent and rrul as depicted in the getting started page. You may
> find the results here:
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1NIGPpCMrJgi8Pb27t9a9VbVOGzsKLE0K/view?usp=sharing
Thanks for sharing! That is some terrible bloat, though! :(
-Toke
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bloat] starlink
2020-11-30 23:19 [Bloat] starlink Conor Beh
2020-12-01 13:20 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
@ 2020-12-01 14:02 ` Michael Richardson
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Michael Richardson @ 2020-12-01 14:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Conor Beh; +Cc: bloat
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 630 bytes --]
Conor Beh <conor@conorbeh.com> wrote:
> Jim Gettys made a reddit post on r/Starlink asking for data from beta
> testers. I am one of those testers. I spun up an Ubuntu VM and did
> three
Do you have: IPv4? Is it RFC1918? IPv6? DHCPv6-PD?
Where does your traffic get to the Internet?
Can you communicate directly with other Starlink users, without going to the
data center?
--
] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | IoT architect [
] mcr@sandelman.ca http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 487 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bloat] starlink
2020-12-01 13:20 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
@ 2020-12-01 14:39 ` Jonathan Morton
2020-12-03 8:38 ` Jonas Mårtensson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Morton @ 2020-12-01 14:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen; +Cc: Conor Beh, bloat
> On 1 Dec, 2020, at 3:20 pm, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen via Bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
>
>> Jim Gettys made a reddit post on r/Starlink asking for data from beta
>> testers. I am one of those testers. I spun up an Ubuntu VM and did three
>> runs of flent and rrul as depicted in the getting started page. You may
>> find the results here:
>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1NIGPpCMrJgi8Pb27t9a9VbVOGzsKLE0K/view?usp=sharing
>
> Thanks for sharing! That is some terrible bloat, though! :(
I imagine it exists in the uplink device rather than the Starlink network itself. Distinct upload and download bloat tests would help in determining whether it's at your end or the remote end. You should be able to use dslreports.com/speedtest to determine that.
- Jonathan Morton
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bloat] starlink
2020-12-01 14:39 ` Jonathan Morton
@ 2020-12-03 8:38 ` Jonas Mårtensson
2020-12-12 20:40 ` Dave Taht
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jonas Mårtensson @ 2020-12-03 8:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jonathan Morton, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen, conor, bloat
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2001 bytes --]
> Thanks for sharing! That is some terrible bloat, though! :(
Also widely varying download speed.
> I imagine it exists in the uplink device rather than the Starlink
network itself. Distinct upload and download bloat tests would help in
determining whether it's at your end or the remote end. You should be able
to use dslreports.com/speedtest to determine that.
I'm not the OP but from the reddit thread (
https://www.reddit.com/r/Starlink/comments/k0dwon/starlink_and_bufferbloat_testing/.compact),
this is their dslreports test:
http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/66406433
It does look like the main problem is in the uplink. The download speed
looks much more consistent in the dslreports test but I guess that
could also be due to the short duration of the test.
Another user from the reddit thread showing similar results:
http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/66406098
/Jonas
On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 3:39 PM Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > On 1 Dec, 2020, at 3:20 pm, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen via Bloat <
> bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
> >
> >> Jim Gettys made a reddit post on r/Starlink asking for data from beta
> >> testers. I am one of those testers. I spun up an Ubuntu VM and did three
> >> runs of flent and rrul as depicted in the getting started page. You may
> >> find the results here:
> >>
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1NIGPpCMrJgi8Pb27t9a9VbVOGzsKLE0K/view?usp=sharing
> >
> > Thanks for sharing! That is some terrible bloat, though! :(
>
> I imagine it exists in the uplink device rather than the Starlink network
> itself. Distinct upload and download bloat tests would help in determining
> whether it's at your end or the remote end. You should be able to use
> dslreports.com/speedtest to determine that.
>
> - Jonathan Morton
> _______________________________________________
> Bloat mailing list
> Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3323 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bloat] starlink
2020-12-03 8:38 ` Jonas Mårtensson
@ 2020-12-12 20:40 ` Dave Taht
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Dave Taht @ 2020-12-12 20:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jonas Mårtensson
Cc: Jonathan Morton, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen, conor, bloat
Sigh. On the plus side the hardware in use on the UFO is a pretty good
QCA platform. It is speculated
on another thread that it actually runs openwrt. So with a few
soldiered on pins to get at a serial port
or figuring out some other way into the box.... we could make a dent in this.
On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 12:38 AM Jonas Mårtensson
<martensson.jonas@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for sharing! That is some terrible bloat, though! :(
>
> Also widely varying download speed.
>
> > I imagine it exists in the uplink device rather than the Starlink network itself. Distinct upload and download bloat tests would help in determining whether it's at your end or the remote end. You should be able to use dslreports.com/speedtest to determine that.
>
> I'm not the OP but from the reddit thread (https://www.reddit.com/r/Starlink/comments/k0dwon/starlink_and_bufferbloat_testing/.compact), this is their dslreports test:
>
> http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/66406433
>
> It does look like the main problem is in the uplink. The download speed looks much more consistent in the dslreports test but I guess that could also be due to the short duration of the test.
>
> Another user from the reddit thread showing similar results:
>
> http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/66406098
>
> /Jonas
>
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 3:39 PM Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > On 1 Dec, 2020, at 3:20 pm, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen via Bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Jim Gettys made a reddit post on r/Starlink asking for data from beta
>> >> testers. I am one of those testers. I spun up an Ubuntu VM and did three
>> >> runs of flent and rrul as depicted in the getting started page. You may
>> >> find the results here:
>> >> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1NIGPpCMrJgi8Pb27t9a9VbVOGzsKLE0K/view?usp=sharing
>> >
>> > Thanks for sharing! That is some terrible bloat, though! :(
>>
>> I imagine it exists in the uplink device rather than the Starlink network itself. Distinct upload and download bloat tests would help in determining whether it's at your end or the remote end. You should be able to use dslreports.com/speedtest to determine that.
>>
>> - Jonathan Morton
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bloat mailing list
>> Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bloat mailing list
> Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
--
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public
relations, for Mother Nature cannot be fooled" - Richard Feynman
dave@taht.net <Dave Täht> CTO, TekLibre, LLC Tel: 1-831-435-0729
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-12-12 20:40 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-11-30 23:19 [Bloat] starlink Conor Beh
2020-12-01 13:20 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-12-01 14:39 ` Jonathan Morton
2020-12-03 8:38 ` Jonas Mårtensson
2020-12-12 20:40 ` Dave Taht
2020-12-01 14:02 ` Michael Richardson
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox