From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <ryan@mounce.com.au>
Received: from mail-pl1-x62b.google.com (mail-pl1-x62b.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::62b])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C145B3CB35
 for <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Tue,  2 Apr 2019 09:16:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by mail-pl1-x62b.google.com with SMTP id b3so3286017plr.7
 for <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Tue, 02 Apr 2019 06:16:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=mounce.com.au; s=google;
 h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to
 :cc:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=dAet6NV4IIrJGc2N01kIy5ziUI5IddFj4uhdyqK1sbc=;
 b=oMhSpC84ILT6lhIklMfh6KOXKmAtwqgs8OgWPS9wtJtRjGLOC7/a2Sw9iPvTJLWMT+
 192xQ9ytklf8Y6BBSijuOHabYOJZhGKx+GBN7FNB8fFcwrWrUB+nVD+klaT7tCJuTIz2
 0ajecDLIBRyHXfvKcPHS/ewxdrLTquOGTpG+RF1pLE9eYVGbyv7jiLcUs4b41PQmovaX
 IfR4fLqgR1yLdBLjoieQiMnd77el7oYrsIEnZWCls+Ddcj1w8CjnIyKJd/isgezlkRQV
 sRIQVRdw0i4KcgB95P6PJD3oAdkef8liXkzH/qE3kKemsssmFgOnIRsxhWr2HnjuplGr
 lLBg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=dAet6NV4IIrJGc2N01kIy5ziUI5IddFj4uhdyqK1sbc=;
 b=WrvM2z0UisnwU3hjn5CTX3fem7I6998yJm0A/wOSFFRGHviWJdmLU7kugNs9RCUu4V
 YnePW4te0NZv/U0v1Jpmd/OA8qF3LfCgWAuWMcgqReiqdClHG/Fm3Ay4zQAN2hkF5alQ
 3GScShrnIWyREWL/rKPxquFixzPJn70Yx9PKW5Or5Y9hFHpCneC0lAqqtZJPxH6AOiF5
 6xwsiQ6MkOKLKXD2w1YvP3J2ND5yaO+sc+nyQdrWy5BvxdQhkRDwge8lRVEnGhmq/81z
 dgdZYXu3PvVExX9pxfZf/tzqx2xHWVGfY/hLipP2/OlcEvUC0HwPeCepchUnLiByJ/uB
 3fGA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVYy+9pnUycCHm5eQK6EZ4by9UarnQCGiQIC1AXd9VaqsyBuChR
 iShRjE7TcN3c/13a5nCWdAekTHuvAYM0EfTZbkfoyg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxi5JpxAcff4kiWSTqac10a0PimHfFhXQ/c0+h2h/Vugykv50/VCCDKVoWj/a6JMM9/LZ9anBJo6pXA+XWkZLA=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:e48f:: with SMTP id
 cj15mr68272690plb.256.1554210968170; 
 Tue, 02 Apr 2019 06:16:08 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <ED9289F4-B466-432F-ABD3-C5F14EC5DAA3@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <ED9289F4-B466-432F-ABD3-C5F14EC5DAA3@gmx.de>
From: Ryan Mounce <ryan@mounce.com.au>
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 23:45:57 +1030
Message-ID: <CAN+fvRYF2TkQxP-rC0F0d=AAHbkFvWjpeLMxhuQwxTjRHY8QEA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de>
Cc: bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
 Jonathan Foulkes <jfoulkes@evenroute.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [Bloat] number of home routers with ingress AQM
X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat <bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/bloat>,
 <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat>
List-Post: <mailto:bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat>,
 <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2019 13:16:10 -0000

On Tue, 2 Apr 2019 at 22:08, Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de> wrote:
>
> I just wondered if anybody has any reasonable estimate how many end-users=
 actually employ fair-queueing AQMs with active ECN-marking for ingress tra=
ffic @home? I am trying to understand whether L4S approach to simply declar=
e these as insignificant in number is justifiable?

L4S people are concerned by RFC 3168 / "classic" ECN bottlenecks
*without* fq. I don't think there would be any such ingress shapers
configured on home gateways. Certainly not by anyone on this list...
anyone running non-fq codel or flowblind cake for ingress shaping?

-Ryan